Differences among plant species in acceptance by the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 177-183

  Van Den Boom, C E M ^a   Van Beek, T A ^a   Dicke, M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFENSE MECHANISM; HOST PLANT; HOST PREFERENCE; MITE; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; TOXICITY;

ACACIA; ACARI; ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; CAPSICUM; CAPSICUM ANNUUM VAR. ANNUUM; DATURA STRAMONIUM; FABACEAE; GINKGO BILOBA; GLYCINE MAX; HUMULUS; HUMULUS LUPULUS; INSECTA; LABURNUM ANAGYROIDES; MALUS X DOMESTICA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; PSEUDOACACIA; ROBINIA PSEUDO-ACACIA; ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM MELALONGA; SOLANUM MELONGENA; TABACUM; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE; URTICAE; VIGNA UNGUICULATA; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 0037399126     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00726.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BERNAYS, E. A.; CHAPMAN, R. F., 1994: Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. New York: Chapman & Hall.
2. BROWN, G. C.; NURDIN, F.; RODRIGUEZ, J. G.; HILDEBRAND, D. F., 1991: Inducible resistance of soybean (var 'Williams') to twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 64, 388-393.
3. DEL CAMPO, M. L.; RENWICK, J. A., 2000: Induction of host specificity in larvae of Manduca sexta: chemical dependence controlling host recognition and developmental rate. Chemoecology 10, 115-121.
4. DABROWSKI, Z. T., 1973: Studies on the relationships of Tetranychus urticae Koch and host plants. II. Gustatory effect of some plant extracts. Bull. Entomol. Pologne 43, 127-138.
5. DICKE, M., 1986: Volatile spider-mite pheromone and host-plant kairomone, involved in spaced-out gregariousness in the spider mite Tetranycus urticae. Physiol. Entomol. 11, 251-262.
6. DICKE, M., 2000: Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multitrophic perspective. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28, 601-617.
7. FRY, J. D., 1989: Evolutionary adaptation to host plants in a laboratory population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Oecologia 81, 559-565.
8. FU-SHUN, Y.; EVANS, K. A.; STEVENS, L. H.; VAN BEEK, T. A.; SCHOONHOVEN, L. M., 1990: Deterrents extracted from the leaves of Ginkgo biloba: effects on feeding and contact chemoreceptors. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54, 57-64.
9. GOULD, F., 1979: Rapid host range evolution in a population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Evolution 33, 791-802.
10. VAN HAREN, R. J. F.; STEENHUIS, M. M.; SABELIS, M. W.; DE PONTI, O. M. B., 1987: Tomato stem trichomes and dispersal success of Phytoseiulus persimilis relative to its prey Tetranychus urticae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 3, 115-121.
11. HEGNAUER, R.; HEGNAUER, M., 1973: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen: eine übersicht über die Verbreitung und die systematische Bedeutung der Pflanzenstoffe. Birkhäuser: Basel, part VI, 403-452.
12. HILDEBRAND, D. F.; RODRIGUEZ, J. G.; BROWN, G. C.; Luu, K. T.; VOLDEN, C. S., 1986: Peroxidative responses of leaves in two soybean genotypes injured by twospotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 79, 1459-1465.
13. HILDEBRAND, D. F.; RODRIGUEZ, J. R.; LEGG, C. S.; BROWN, G. C.; BOOKJANS, G., 1989: The effects of wounding and mite infestation on soybean leaf lipoxygenase levels. Z. Naturforschung C 44, 655-659.
14. KARBAN, R.; BALDWIN, I. T., 1997: Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15. KARBAN, R.; CAREY, J. R., 1984: Induced resistance of cotton seedlings to mites. Science 225, 53-54.
16. KARBAN, R.; MYERS, J. H., 1989: Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 331-348.
17. LESZCZYNSKI, B.; WRIGHT, L. C.; CONE, W. W.; KENNY, S. T., 1988: Hop leaf phenolics and resistance to the twospotted spider mite. J. Agric. Entomol. 5, 257-266.
18. LUCZYNSKI, A.; ISMAN, M. B.; RAWORTH, D. A.; CHAN, C. K., 1990: Chemical and morphological factors of resistance against the twospotted spider mite in beach strawberry. J. Econ. Entomol. 83, 564-569.
19. MAJOR, R. T., 1967: The ginkgo, the most ancient living tree. Science 157, 1270-1273.
20. MATOLSCY, Gy.; NÁDASY, M.; ANDRISKA, V., 1988: Pesticide Chemistry, vol. 32. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. MATSUMOTO, T.; SEI, T., 1987: Antifeedant activities of Ginkgo biloba. Agric. Biol. Chem. 51, 249-250.
22. MECHABER, W. L.; HILDEBRAND, J. G., 2000: Novel, non solanaceous hostplant record for Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in the Southwestern United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93, 447-451.
23. MULLIN, C. A.; GONZALEZ, C. A.; GUTIERREZ, C.; REINA, M.; EICHENSEER, H.; HOLLISTER, B.; CHYB, S., 1997: Antifeedant effects of some novel terpenoids on Chrysomelidae beetles: comparisons with alkaloids on an alkaloid-adapted and nonadapted species. J. Chem. Ecol. 23, 1851-1866.
24. OHSAKI, N.; SATO, Y., 1994: Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75, 59-68.
25. PATTERSON, C. G.; THURSTON, R.; RODRIGUEZ, J. G., 1974: Twospotted spider mite resistance in Nicotiana species. J. Econ. Entomol. 67, 341-343.
26. PETERS, K. M.; BERRY, R. E., 1980a: Effect of hop leaf morphology on twospotted spider mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 73, 235-238.
27. PETERS, K. M.; BERRY, R. E., 1980b: Resistance of hop varieties to twospotted spider mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 73, 232-234.
28. RODRIGUEZ, J. G.; KNAVEL, D. E.; AINA, O. J., 1972: Studies in the resistance of tomatoes to mites. J. Econ. Entomol. 65, 50-52.
29. ROSENTHAL, G. A.; BERENBAUM, M. R. (eds) 1991: Herbivores, their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites, 2nd edn, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
30. SCHOONHOVEN, L. M.; JERMY, T.; VAN LOON, J. J. A., 1998: Insect-Plant Biology. From Physiology to Evolution. London: Chapman & Hall.
31. SCHRUFT, G. A., 1985: Grapes. In: Spider Mites: their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, vol. 1B. Ed. by HELLE, W.; SABELIS, M. W. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 359-366.
32. SHECK, A. L.; GOULD, F., 1996: The genetic basis of differences in growth and behavior of specialist and generalist herbivore species: selection on hybrids of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa (Lepidoptera). Evolution 50, 831-841.
33. STOUT, M. J.; WORKMAN, J.; DUFFEY, S. S., 1994: Differential induction of tomato foliar proteins by arthropod herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 2575-2594.
34. STRONG, W. B.; CROFT, B. A.; SLONE, D. H., 1997: Spatial aggregation and refugia of the mites Tetranychus urticae and Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae) on hop. Environ. Entomol. 26, 859-865.
35. TOLLRIAN, R.; HARVELL, C. D. (eds) 1999: The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. VAN DE VRIE, M.; MURTRY, J. A.; HUFFAKER, C. B., 1972: Ecology of mites and their natural enemies. A review. III Biology, ecology, and pest status, and host plant relations of Tetranychids. Hilgardia 41, 354-432.
37. WHEATLEY, J. A. C.; BOETHEL, D. J., 1992: Populations of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its host, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), on resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars. J. Econ. Entomol. 85, 731-738.
38. YANO, S.; WAKABAYASHI, M.; TAKABAYASHI, J.; TAKAFUJI, A., 1998: Factors determining the host plant range of the phytophagous mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): a method for quantifying host plant acceptance. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22, 595-601.