Weighing the homeopathic evidence

Homeopathy

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 67-68

  Ernst, E ^a  

^a PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0037398650     PISSN: 14754916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-4916(03)00002-X     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Mathie RT. The research evidence base for homeopathy: a fresh assessment of the literature. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 80-87.
2. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Stevinson C, White AR, Eisenberg D. The Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Edinburgh: Mosby, 2001.
3. Ernst E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 577-582.
4. Linde K, Willich SN. How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 17-22.