Role of abrasion of the femoral component in revision knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 393-398

  Siddique, M S ^a   Rao, M C ^a,b   Deehan, D J ^a   Pinder, I M ^a  

^a FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b YSBYTY GWYNEDD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ABRASION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHRITIS, JUVENILE RHEUMATOID; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POLYETHYLENES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 0037397650     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.13041     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE, Sobel M. The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;226:86-92.
2. Insall JN. Revision of total knee replacement. The Instructional Course Lectures. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Vol. 35, St Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1986:290-6.
3. Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Crackow KA, Lennox DW. Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic failure. Clin Orthop 1988;226:78-85.
4. Ahlberg A, Lunden A. Secondary operation after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1981;156:170-4.
5. Bargar WL, Cracchiolo A III, Amstutz HC. Results with the constrained total knee prosthesis in treating severely disabled patients with failed total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1980;62-A:504-12.
6. Cameron HU, Hunter GA. Failure in total knee arthroplasty: mechanism, revision, and results. Clin Orthop 1982;170:141-6.
7. Insall JN, Dethmers DA. Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982;170:123-30.
8. Kim L, Finerman G. Results of revision for aseptic failed knee arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 1983;7:535.
9. Morrey BF, Westholm F, Schoifet S, Rand JA, Bryan RS. Long term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989;248:120-8.
10. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urse WK, Miller DV, Brause BD. 2-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection: further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:272-8.
11. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1976;58-A:754-65.
12. Kleinbaum DG, Kopper LL, Muller KE, eds. Analysis of categorical data. In: Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press, 1988:537-540.
13. Hungerford DS, Kenna RV. Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. Clin Orthop 1983;176:95-107.
14. Hungerford DS, Kenna RV, Krackow KA. The porous coated anatomic total knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:103-22.
15. Moran CG, Pinder IM, Lees PA, Midwinter MJ. Survivorship analysis of uncemented porous coated anatomic knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:848-57.
16. Jones SMG, Pinder IM, Moran CG, Malcolm AJ. Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:848-57.
17. Rose RM, Crugnola A, Ries M, et al. On the origin of high in vivo wear rates in polyethylene components of total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 1979;145:277-86.
18. Ranawat CS, Johanson NA, Rimnac CM, Wright TM, Schwartz RE. Retrieval analysis of porous coated components for total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases. Clin Orthop 1986;209:244-48.
19. Kim Y-H, Oh J-H, Oh S-H. Osteolysis around cementless porous-coated anatomic knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:236-41.
20. Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81-A:115-36.
21. Cooper J, Dowson D, Fisher J. The effect of transfer film and surface roughness on the wear of lubricated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Clin Mater 1993;14:295-302.
22. Fisher J. Surface damage to femoral head prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:852.
23. Fisher J, Firkins P, Reeves EA, Hailey JL, Isaac GH. The influence of scratches to metallic counterfaces on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part H-J. Eng Med 1995;209:263-4.
24. Margevicius KJ, Bauer TW, McMahon JT, Brown SA, Merritt K. Isolation and characterisation of debris in membranes around total joint prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:1664-75.
25. Tipper JL, Ingham E, Hailey JL, et al. Quantitative comparison of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved hip prosthesis. Trans ORS 1997;22:355.
26. Athanasou NA, Quinn J, Bulstrode CJK. Resorption of bone by inflammatory cells derived from the joint capsule of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:57-62.
27. Murray DW, Rushton N. Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72-B:988-92.
28. Nolan JF, Bucknill TN. Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:23-4.
29. Learmonth ID, Cunningham JL. Factors contributing to the wear of polyethylene is clinical practice. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1997;211:49-57.