Interpreting negative results: Postpartum interview position not associated with improved outcomes

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 157, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 333-335

  Mabry, Iris R ^a   Richmond, Tracy ^b   Bialostozky, Adriana ^b   Rushton, Jerry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POSTNATAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0037394694     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.4.333     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Valdes XL, Kurbasic M, Whitfill BS, Sessler DI. Postpartum interviews: factors affecting patients' learning and satisfaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157:327-330.
2. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook OJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature, II: how to use an article about therapy and prevention, A: are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1993;270:2598-2601.
3. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature, II: how to use an article about therapy and prevention, B: what were the results, and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994:271:59-63.
4. Cummings SR, Grady D, Hulley SB. Designing an experiment: clinical trials I. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:150-151.
5. Moore DS, McCabe GP. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Freeman; 1998:484.
6. Browner WS, Newman TB, Hearst, Hulley SB. Getting ready to estimate sample size: hypotheses and underlying principles, in: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 51-63.
7. Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ. 1997;315:640-645.
8. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to 2 institutional review boards. JAMA. 1992;267:374-378.
9. Klassen TP, Wiebe N, Russell K, et al. Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the Society for Pediatric Research meeting: an example of publication bias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:474-479.
10. Sterne JAC, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence: what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322:226-231.
11. Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994;272:122-124.
12. Dimick JB, Diener-West M, Lipsett PA. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature. Arch Surg. 2001;136:796-800.