Innovation and spatial externalities

International Regional Science Review

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 167-174

  Audretsch, David B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Knowledge spillovers; Spatial externalities

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; SPILLOVER EFFECT;

EID: 0037394674     PISSN: 01600176     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0160017602250973     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Acs. Z. 2002. Innovation and the growth of cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2. Acs, Z., and D. Audretsch. 1990. Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Acs, Z., D. Audretsch. and M. Feldman. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 100: 336-40.
4. Acs, Z., and A. Varga. 2002. Geography, endogenous growth and innovation. International Regional Science Review 25: 132-49.
5. Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1997. The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics 9: 21-31.
6. Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Zoltan J. Acs. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422-48.
7. Anselin, L., 2000. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science 79: 435-43.
8. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity, edited by R. Nelson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Audretsch, D. 1995. Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Audretsch, D., and M. Feldman. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 253-73.
11. Audretsch, D., and P. Stephan. 1996. Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 86: 641-52.
12. Breschi, Stefano, and Francesco Lissoni. 2001. Localized knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge "tacitness" reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science 80: 255-73.
13. Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Feldman, M., and D. Audretsch. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409-29.
15. Fritsch, M. 2002. Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems: A knowledge production approach. International Regional Science Review 25: 86-102.
16. Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer, 1992. Growth of cities. Journal of Political Economy 100: 1126-52.
17. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116.
18. Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spill-overs. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 29-47.
19. Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
20. Jaffe, A. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957-70.
21. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 63: 577-98.
22. Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Porter, M. 1990. The comparative advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
24. Romer, Paul. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-37.
25. Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
26. Oerlemans, L., M. Meeus, and F. Boekema, 2001. Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects. Papers in Regional Science 80: 337-56.
27. Saxenian, A. 1990. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review 33: 89-111.
28. Varga, A. 1998. University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Boston: Kluwer Academic.