Predictive value of two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound evaluation of the cervix in preterm labor

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 237-241

  Rozenberg, P ^a,b   Rafii, A ^a   Senat M V ^a   Dujardin, A ^a   Rapon, J ^a   Ville, Y ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical length; Cervical volume; Preterm labor; Three dimensional ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AMNION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MACHINE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROC CURVE; THREE DIMENSIONAL TRIPLAN TECHNIQUE; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERUS CONTRACTION;

EID: 0037392278     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/jmf.13.4.237.241     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hall MH, Danielian P, Lamont RF. The importance of preterm birth. In Elder MG, Lamont RF, Romero R, eds. Preterm Labor. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997:1-28
2. Blondel B, Du Mauzaubrun C, Bréart G. Enquête nationale périnatale 1995. Rapport de fin d'étude. Paris: Edition INSERM, 1996
3. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews MS. Final Data for 1997: National Vital Statistics Reports, vol 47, no. 18. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998
4. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews MS. Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1996; Monthly Vital Statistics Report, vol 46, no. 11; Suppl. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998
5. Keirse MJNC. An evaluation of formal risk scoring for preterm birth. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:226-33
6. Creasey RK, Merkatz IR. Prevention of preterm birth: clinical opinion. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76(Suppl 1):25-45
7. Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, et al. Warning symptoms, uterine contractions, and cervical examination findings in women at risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:748-54
8. McLean M, Walters WAW, Smith R. Prediction and early diagnosis of preterm labor: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993;48:209-25
9. Shiono PH, Klebanoff MA. A review of risk scoring for preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 1993;20:107-25
10. Iams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, et al. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:40-6
11. Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:956-64
12. Crane JM, Van Den Hof M, Armson BA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357-63
13. Timor-Tritsch IE, Boozarjomehri F, Masakowski Y, et al. Can a 'snapshot' sagittal view of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography predict active preterm labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:990-5
14. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Arduini D, et al. The value of fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions and of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting premature delivery for patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1146-51
15. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L, et al. Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:196-9
16. Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology: technique, possibilities and limitations. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1773-8
17. Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G. Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:222-7
18. Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. Three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:219-21
19. Riccabona M, Pretorius DH, Nelson TR, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound: display modalities in obstetrics. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:157-67
20. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three-dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:941-52
21. Needleman L. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three-dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:941-52
22. Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging in obstetrics: present and future applications. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:391-408
23. Bega G, Kuhlman K, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Application of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:307-13
24. Hoesli IM, Surbek DV, Tercanli S, et al. Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D-sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115-19
25. Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, et al. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351-8
26. Strauss A, Heer I, Fuchshuber S, et al. Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:346-53