A fuzzy neural network model for deriving the river stage-discharge relationship

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 197-209

  Deka, Paresh ^a   Chandramouli, V ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network model; Brahmaputra River basin; Fuzzy neural network model; India; Modularized neural network model; Stage discharge relationship

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; FUZZY SETS; HYDROLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS; RIVERS;

RATING CURVES;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS);

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STAGE-DISCHARGE RELATIONSHIP;

INDIA;

EID: 0037388488     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.48.2.197.44697     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brown, M. & Harris, C. (1994) Neuro-Fuzzy Adaptive Modeling and Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
2. Chandramouli, V. & Raman, H. (2001) Multi-reservoir modeling with dynamic programming and neural networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. ASCE 127(2), 89-98.
3. Chung, F. L. & Duan, J. C. (2000) Multistage fuzzy neural network modeling. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 8(2), 125-142.
4. Cox, E. (1994) The Fuzzy Systems Handbook. Academic Press Professional.Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
5. Elshorbagy, A., Simonovic S. P. & Panu, U. S. (2000) Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks for runoff prediction. J. Hydrol. Engng ASCE 5(4), 424-427.
6. Hu, T. S., Lam, K. C. & Ng. S. T. (2001) River flow time series prediction with a range dependent neural network. Hydrol. Sci. J. 46(5), 729-745.
7. Hundecha, Y., Bardossy, A. & Theisen, H. W. (2001) Development of a fuzzy logic-based rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol. Sci. J. 46(3), 363-376.
8. Jain, S. K. & Chalisgaonkar, D. (2000) Setting up stage-discharge relations using ANN. J. Hydrol.Engng ASCE 5(4), 428-433.
9. Karunanithi, N., Grenney, W. J., Whitley, D. & Bovee, K. (1994) Neural networks for river flow prediction. J. Computers Civ. Engng ASCE 8(2), 201-220.
10. Maidment, D. R. (1993) Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
11. Minns, A. W. & Hall, M. J. (1996) Artificial neural networks as rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 41(3), 399-418.
12. Mitra, S. & Hayashi, Y. (2000) Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: survey in soft computing framework. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 11(3), 748-768.
13. Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. L. (1987) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vols 1 and II, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, USA.
14. Rajurkar, M. P., Kothyari, U. C. & Chaube, U. C. (2002) Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47(6), 865-877.
15. See, L. & Openshaw, S. (1999) Applying soft computing approaches to river level forecasting, Hydrol. Sci. J. 44(5), 763-778.
16. See, L. & Openshaw, S. (2000) A hybrid multi-model approach to river level forecasting. Hydrol. Sci. J. 45(4), 523-536.
17. Tawfik, M., Ibrahim, A. & Fahmy, H. (1997) Hysteresis sensitivity neural network for modeling rating curves. J. Computers in Civ. Engng ASCE 11(3), 206-211.
18. Xiong, L. & O'Connor, K. M. (2002) Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting, Hydrol. Sci. J. 47(4), 621-639.
19. Zhang, B. & Govindaraju, R. S. (2000) Prediction of watershed runoff using Bayesian concepts and modular neural networks. Water Resour. Res. 36(3), 753-762.