Management plans and Oregon's NIPF owners: A survey of attitudes and practices

Western Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 127-132

  Elwood, Norman E ^a   Hansen, Eric N ^a   Oester, Paul ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Family forestry; Landowner objectives; Management planning; NIPF

Indexed keywords

PLANNING;

LANDOWNERS;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; OREGON; OWNERSHIP; PLANNING;

EID: 0037388081     PISSN: 08856095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/wjaf/18.2.127     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ALIG, R.J., K.J. LEE, AND R.J. MOULTON. 1990. Likelihood of timber management on nonindustrial private forests: Evidence from research studies. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-GTR-60. 17 p.
2. BIRCH, T.W. 1996. Private forest-land owners of the United States, 1994. USDA For. Serv. Res. Bull. NE-134. 183 p.
3. BIRCH, T.W., AND C.M. STELTER. 1993. Trends in owner attitudes. P. 50-60 in Penns woods - change and challenge, Finley, J.C., and S.B. Jones (eds.). The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
4. BLATNER, K., D. BAUMGARTNER, AND L. QUACKENBUSH. 1991. NIPF use of landowner assistance and education programs in Washington State. West. J. Appl. For. 6(4):90-94.
5. DATAQUICK. 1996. CD-ROM License Agreement. Data Disk #16. Portland, OR.
6. DILLMAN, D.A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley, New York. 325 p.
7. FORCE, J.E., AND H.W. LEE. 1991. Nonindustrial private forest owners in Idaho. West. J. Appl. For. 6(2):32-36.
8. HAYNES, R., D. ADAMS, AND J. MILLS. 1995. The 1993 RPA timber assessment update. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-259. 66 p.
9. JOHNSON, R.L., R.J. ALIG, E. MOORE, AND R.J. MOULTON. 1997. NIPF landowners' view of regulation. J. For. 95(1):23-28.
10. JONES, S.B., A.E. LULOFF, AND J.C. FINLEY. 1995. Another look at NIPFs: Facing our "myths." J. For. 93(9):41-44.
11. LAFORD, R.J., AND R.G. PARKER. 1988. Forest management plans for private landowners: An evaluation of New Hampshire's experimental cost share program. J. For. 86(10): 19-22.
12. MOULTON, R.J., AND T.W. BIRCH. 1996. Western forest landowners: A profile. Nat. Woodl. 19(3): 14-16.
13. ODF. 1998. 1998 Timber harvest report. Salem, OR. 6 p.
14. ODF. 1989. Oregon woodland ownersurvey. Oregon State Univ. Survey Res. Cent. Oregon State Dep. of For., Salem OR. 68 p.
15. SAMPSON, R.N., AND L.A. DECOSTER. 1996. Mini-survey: Forestry program providers and participants. The Forest Policy Center, American Forests, Washington, DC. 23 p.
16. SCHNEPF, C., AND W. SCHLOSSER. 1992. Idaho forest stewardship focus groups: Qualitative needs assessment of inactive non-industrial private forest owners. University of Idaho Coop. Ext. Syst., Moscow. 10 p.
17. SNEDECOR, G.W., AND W.G. COCHRAN. 1974. Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 593 p.
18. TICKNOR, W.D. 1993, A survey of selected forestland owners in southcentral Indiana. Forestry Consultants Inc., Orient, OH.