The role of frozen section examination of conisations in the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 364-370

  Bretelle, Florence ^a,c   Agostini, Aubert ^a   Rojat Habib, Marie Christine ^b   Cravello, Ludovic ^a   Roger, Valérie ^a   Blanc, Bernard ^a  

^a Department of Medicine   (France)

^b TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c HÔPITAL DE LA CONCEPTION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER TISSUE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TISSUE SECTION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE ENDOCERVIX;

EID: 0037388034     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02268.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gardeil F., Barry-Walsh C., Prendiville W., Clinch J., Turner M.J. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol. 89:1997;419-422.
2. Baldauf J.J., Dreyfus M., Ritter J., Cuenin C., Tissier I., Meyer P. Cytology and colposcopy after loop electrosurgical excision: implication for follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 92:1998;124-130.
3. Lapaquette T.K., Dinh T.V., Hannigan E.V., Doherty M.G., Yandell R.B., Buchanan V.S. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conisation. Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;440-443.
4. Narducci F., Ocelli B., Boman F., Vinatier D., Leroy J.L. Positive margins after conization and risk of persistent lesion. Gynecol Oncol. 76:2000;311-314.
5. Huang L.W., Hwang J.L. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Gynecol Oncol. 73:1999;12-15.
6. Paterson-Brown S., Chapatte O.A., Clark SK et al. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol. 46:1992;182-185.
7. Chang D.Y., Cheng W.F., Torng P.L., Chen R.J., Huang S.C. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens. Gynecol Oncol. 63:1996;53-56.
8. Bigrigg A., Haffenden D.K., Sheehan A.L., Codling B.W., Read M.D. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet. 343:1994;32-34.
9. Felix J.C., Muderspach L.I., Duggan B.D., Roman L.D. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol. 84:1994;996-1000.
10. Zaitoun A.M., McKee G., Coppen M.J., Thomas S.M., Wilson P.O.G. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. J Clin Pathol. 53:2000;191-196.
11. Weyl B., Darazi N., Le Pors-Lemoine P., Forest E. Intérêt de l'examen anatomopathologique extemporané dans les conisations. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 25:1996;457-463.
12. Bretelle F., Cravello L., Yang L., Benmoura D., Roger V., Blanc B. Conisation with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted? Ann Chir. 125:2000;444-449.
13. Leiman G., Harrison N.A., Rubin A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 136:1980;14-18.
14. de Cabezon R.H., Sala C.V., Gomis S.S., Lliso A.R., Bellvert C.G. Evaluation of cervical dysplasia treatment by large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Does completeness of excision determine outcome? Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 78:1998;83-89.
15. Paraskevaidis E., Kitchener H., Adonakis G., Parkin D., Lolis D. Incomplete excision of CIN in conization: further excision or conservative management? Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 53:1994;45-47.
16. Duggan B.D., Felix J.C., Muderspach LI et al. Cold-knife conization versus conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomised, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 180:1999;276-282.
17. Woodford H.D., Poston W., Elkins T.E. Reliability of the frozen section in sharp knife cone biopsy of the cervix. J Reprod Med. 31:1986;951-953.
18. Neiger R., Bailey S.A., Wall A.M., Jennings J.B., Gallup D.G. Evaluating cervical cone biopsy specimens with frozen sections at hysterectomy. J Reprod Med. 36:1991;103-107.
19. Murdoch J.B., Morgan P.R., Lopes A., Monaghan J.M. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:1992;990-993.
20. Hannigan E.V., Simpson J.S., Dillard E.A. Jr., Dinh T.V. Frozen section evaluation of cervical conization specimens. J Reprod Med. 31:1986;11-14.
21. Hoffmans M.S., Collins E., Roberts W.S., Fiorica J.V., Guanasekaran S., Cavanagh D. Cervical conization with frozen section before planned hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;394-398.
22. Fletchers S., Smart G.E., Livingstone J.R. Grading of cervical dysplasias by frozen section. Lancet. 2:1985;599-600.
23. Lu C.H., Liu F.S., Tseng J.J., Ho E.S.C. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conisation for CIN III. Gynecol Oncol. 79:2000;284-288.
24. Moore B.C., Higgins R.V., Laurent S.L., Marroum M.C., Bellitt P. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 173:1995;361-368.
25. Bar-Am A., Daniel Y., Ron IG et al. Combined colposcopy, Loop conization and laser vaporisation reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 78:2000;47-51.