Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in cantonese level tones

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 413-421

  Wong, Patrick C M ^a   Diehl, Randy L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Speech perception; Talker normalization; Tone language

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; CHINESE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0037387989     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/034)     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blicher, D. L., Diehl, R., & Cohen, L. B. (1990). Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the Mandarin Tone 2/Tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37-49.
2. Chao, Y.-R. (1947). Cantonese primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Fox, R., & Qi, Y. Y. (1990). Context effects in the perception of lexical tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 18, 261-283.
4. Garrett, K. L., & Healey, E. C. (1987). An acoustic analysis of fluctuations in the voices of normal adult speakers across three times of day. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 58-62.
5. Jin, S. (1996). An acoustic study of sentence stress in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of East Asian Language & Literature, The Ohio State University.
6. Johnson, K., & Mullennix, J. W. (Eds.). (1997). Talker uariability in speech processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98-104.
8. Leather, J. (1983). Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 373-382.
9. Liberman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff & R. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp. 157-233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Lin, T., & Wang, W. Y.-S. (1985). Shengdiao ganzhi wenti [Tone perception]. Zhongguo Yuyan Xuebao, 2, 59-69.
11. Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1864-1877.
12. Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistics survey (pp, 5-39). New York: Academic Press.
13. Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184.
14. Scherer. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143-165,
15. Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. R., Shankweiler, D. P., & Edman, T. (1976). Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 213-224.
16. Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1074-1095.
17. Wong, P. C. M., & Diehl, R. L. (1999). The effect of duration on the perception of Cantonese level tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2150(A).
18. Xu, Y. (1994). Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2240-2253.
19. 0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55-105.