Football boot insoles and sensitivity to extent of ankle inversion movement

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 170-174

  Waddington, G ^a,b   Adams R , ^b  

^a CANBERRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; AUTOMATION; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EQUIPMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOOT SOLE; FOOTBALL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; JOINT FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SHOE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; ANKLE INJURIES; ATHLETIC INJURIES; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMANS; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; SHOES; SOCCER;

EID: 0037387234     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.37.2.170     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. McKay G, Goldie P, Payne W, et al. A prospective study of injuries in basketball: a total profile and comparison by gender and standard of competition. J Sci Med Sport 2001;4:196-211.
2. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Injury patterns in soccer. Football Australasia: reducing the injury list. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 1998.
3. Geldard F. The human senses. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972.
4. Jones F. Arboreal man. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold & Co, 1926.
5. McKie R. Dawn of man, the story of human evolution. 1st ed. London: Dorling Kindersley Publishing, 2000.
6. Kekoni J, Haemaeloeinen H, Rautio J, et al. Mechanical sensibility of the sole of the foot determined with vibratory stimuli of varying frequency. Exp Brain Res 1989;78:419-24.
7. Watanabe I, Okubo J. The role of plantar mechanoreceptors in equilibrium control. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1981;77:855-77.
8. Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll J-P. The plantar sole as a "dynamometric map" for human balance control. Neuroreport 1998;9:3247-52.
9. Van Deursen R, Simoneau G. Foot and ankle sensory neuropathy, proprioception and pastural stability. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1999;29:718-26.
10. Haemaelaeinen H, Kekoni J, Rautio J, et al. Effect of unilateral sensory impairment of the sole of the foot on pastural control in man: implications for the role of mechanoreception in pastural control. Hum Mov Sci 1992;11:549-61.
11. Maki B, Perry S, Norrie R, et al. Effect of facilitation of sensation from plantar foot-surface boundaries on pastural stabilization in young and older adults. J Gerontol 1999;6:M281-7.
12. Nigg B. The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new paradigm. Clin J Sports Med 2001;11:2-9.
13. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Stussi E. The movement of the heel within a running shoe. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:695-701.
14. Robbins S, Waked E, McClaren J. Proprioception and stability: foot position awareness as a function of age and footwear. Age Ageing 1995;24:67-72.
15. McKay G, Goldie P, Payne W, et al. Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. Br J Sports Med 2001;35:103-8.
16. Crosbie J, Ko V. Changes in temporal and distance parameters of gait evoked by negotiation of curbs. Aust J Physiother 2000;46:103-12.
17. Chen H-C, Ashton-Miller J, Alexander N, et al. Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 1991;46:M196-203.
18. Waddington G, Adams R. Textured insole effects on ankle movement discrimination while wearing athletic shoes. Physical Therapy in Sport 2000;1:129-36.
19. Robbins S, Waked E. Hazards of deceptive advertising of athletic footwear. Br J Sports Med 1997;31:299-303.
20. Bartold S. The football boot, saint or sinner? Football Australasia: reducing the injury list. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Conference, 1998.
21. Nigg B, Nurse M, Stefanyshyn D. Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:S421-8.
22. Carr J, Shepherd R. A motor learning model for rehabilitation. In: Carr J, Shepherd R, eds. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers Inc, 1987.
23. Waddington G, Adams R. Discrimination of active plantarflexion and inversion movements after injury. Aust J Physiother 1999;45:7-13.
24. Balogun J, Akindele K, Nihinlala J, et al. Age related changes in balance performance. Disability and Rehabilitation 1994;16:58-62.
25. Waddington G, Adams R, Jones A. Wobble board (ankle disc) training effects on discrimination of inversion movements. Aust J Physiother 1999;45:95-101.
26. Ashton-Miller J. Proprioceptive thresholds at the ankle: implications for prevention of ligament injury. In: Lephart S, Fu F, eds. Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2000:279-89.
27. McNicol D. A primer of signal detection theory. London: Allen and Unwin Pty Ltd, 1972.
28. Winer B, Brown D, Michels K. Statistical principles in experimental design. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1991.
29. Robbins S, Gouw G. Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:217-24.
30. Robbins S, Waked E, Rappel R. Ankle taping improves proprioception before and after exercise in young men. Br J Sports Med 1995;29:242-7.
31. Carnahan H, Elliott D. Pedal asymetry in the reproduction of spatial locations. Cortex 1987;23:157-9.
32. Roy E, McKenzie C. Handedness effects in kinesthetic spatial location judgements. Cortex 1978;14:250-8.
33. Fagot J, Lacreuse A, Vauclair J. Roles of sensory and post-sensory factors on hemispheric assymetries in tactual perception. In: Christman S, ed. Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing. London: Elselvier Science, 1997:469-94.