When is model complexity too much? Illustrating the benefits of simple models with Hughes' salvo equations

Naval Research Logistics

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 197-217

  Lucas, Thomas W ^a   McGunnigle, John E ^b  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United States)

Author keywords

Combat models; Defense analysis; Hughes' salvo equations; JWARS; Simulation; Value of information

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THEOREM PROVING;

DEFENCE ANALYSIS;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0037385919     PISSN: 0894069X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nav.10062     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. C. Ancker, "A proposed foundation for a theory of combat," Warfare modeling, Bracken, Kress, and Rosenthal (Editors), Wiley, New York, 1995, pp. 165-197.
2. B. Bennett, Modeling and simulation activities, unpublished RAND briefing, May 1999.
3. V. Bettencourt, Introduction to the third edition, Military modeling for decision making, 3rd edition, W. Hughes (Editor), Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA, 1997, vii-xi.
4. S. Bonder, Army operations research - historical perspectives and lessons learned, Oper Res 50(1) (January-February 2002), 25-34.
5. A. Brandstein, Operational synthesis: Applying science to military science, PHALANX 32(4) (December 1999), 1, 30-31.
6. C. Builder, Combat Modeling at RAND: A Martian Visitor's Perspective, IN-25659-A, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1989.
7. G. Box, "Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building," Robustness in statistics, R. Launer and G. Wilkinson (Editors), Academic Press, New York, 1979.
8. A. Cebrowski and W. Hughes, Rebalancing the Fleet, U.S. Naval Institute Proc 125(11) (November 1999), 31-34.
9. P. Davis, J. Bigelow, and J. McEver, Analytical methods for studies and experiments on transforming the force, DB-278-OSD, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1999.
10. Defense Science Board, Report of the Task Force on Improving Test and Evaluation Effectiveness, The Pentagon, Washington, DC, December 1989.
11. Department of Defense, DoD modeling and simulation (M&S) verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A), DoD Instruction 5000.61, Washington, DC, April 1996.
12. J. Dewar, S. Bankes, J. Hodges, T. Lucas, and P. Vye, Credible uses of the distributed interactive simulation system, MR-607-A, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1996.
13. J. Dewar, J. Gillogly, and M. Juncosa, Non-monotonicity, chaos, and combat models, Mil Oper Res 2(2) (1996), 37-49.
14. W. Edwards, "Conservatism in human information processing," B. Kleinmutz (Editor), Formal representation of human judgement, Wiley, New York, 1968, pp. 17-52.
15. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An introduction to the bootstrap, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
16. A. Enthoven, and K. Smith, How much is enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961-1969, Harper and Row, New York, 1971.
17. B. Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic, Behavioral decision theory, Annu Rev Psychol 28 (1977), 1-39.
18. R. Hamming, Numerical methods for scientists and engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, p. 31.
19. R. Helmbold, On razors and sabers: Occum's razor and other instruments for shaving extraneous assumptions and complexities from models, PHALANX 31(2) (June 1998), 17, 29.
20. J. Hodges and J. Dewar, Is it you or your model talking? A framework for model validation, R-4114-A/AF/OSD, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1992.
21. W. Hughes, Fleet tactics and coastal combat, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, 2000.
22. W. Hughes, "Overview," Military modeling for decision making, 3rd edition, W. Hughes (Editor), Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA, 1997, pp. 1-66.
23. W. Hughes, A salvo model of warships in missile combat used to evaluate their staying power, Warfare Modeling, G. Bracken, M. Kress, and R. Rosenthal (Editors), Wiley, New York, 1995, pp. 121-143.
24. G. Jaffe, Debate surrounding small ship poses fundamental questions for U.S. Navy, The Wall Street Journal, 11 July 2001.
25. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint vision 2020, Washington, DC, 2000.
26. Joint Chiefs of Staff, TACWAR integrated environment, executive overview: Model version 5.1, TACWAR Configuration Control Group, TRAC, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 1998.
27. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint vision 2010, Washington, DC, 1997.
28. JWARS Office, Joint Warfare System (JWARS) Operational Requirements Document (ORD), Arlington, VA, 27 August 1998.
29. JWARS Office, Joint Warfare System (JWARS) overview briefing, Arlington, VA, 26 August 1998.
30. M. Kendall, quoted in Ref. [22].
31. G. Kent, In my opinion: On analysis, PHALANX 33(1) (March 2000), 1, 28-31.
32. T. Lucas, S. Bankes, and P. Vye, Improving the analytic contribution of advanced warfighting experiments (AWEs), DB-207-A, RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1997.
33. J. McGunnigle, An exploratory analysis of the military value of information and force, Master's Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, December 1999.
34. J. McGunnigle, W. Hughes, and T. Lucas, Human experiments on the values of information and force advantage, PHALANX 33(4) (December 2000), 10-11, 26-27.
35. P. Morse and G. Kimball, Methods of operations research, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1951.
36. J. O'Bryon, The difficult task of striking a balance between testing and modeling and simulation (M&S): The live fire test case, unpublished paper, 1996. Available online at: http://www.dote.osd.mil/lfte/JOB97.HTM (accessed 03 December 2002).
37. G. Owen, Game theory, 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp. 1, 33-34.
38. V. Roske, Making analysis relevant, PHALANX 31(1) (March 1998).
39. K. Saeger and J. Hinch, Understanding instability in a complex deterministic combat simulation, Mil Oper Res 6(4) (2001), 43-55.
40. R. Sandmeyer, Simtech Project: Application of supercomputers to division/corps level combat simulation, Interim Note No. C-159, AMSAA, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD, October 1990.
41. P. Slovic, Perception of risk, Science 236 (1987), 280-285.
42. M. Tolcott, F. Marvin, and T. Bresnick, The confirmation bias in military situation assessment, Decision Science Consortium, Reston, VA, 1989.
43. C. Thomas, "Models and wartime combat operations research," Military modeling for decision making, 3rd edition, W. Hughes (Editor), Military Operations Research Society, Alexandria, VA, 1997, pp. 69-112.
44. J. Welch, quoted in F. Hoeber, Military applications of modeling: Selected case studies, Gordon and Beach Science Publishers, New York, 1981, p. 2.
45. K. Yost, Objects, objections, and models, PHALANX 29(3) (September 1996), 6-7, 27-28.
46. M. Youngren, JWARS overview, Operations Research Departmental Seminar, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 28 October 2000.