A primigravida allegedly allergic to local anaesthetics

International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-115

  Brown, S ^a   Jenkins, J R ^a  

^a JAMES PAGET UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; EMLA; FENTANYL; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PRILOCAINE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CROSS REACTION; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; LABOR; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PRURITUS; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; UNITED KINGDOM; URTICARIA;

EID: 0037385348     PISSN: 0959289X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-289X(02)00188-7     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Eggleston S T, Lush L W. Understanding allergic reactions to local anaesthetics. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30: 851-855.
2. Fisher M M, Bowey C J. Alleged allergy to local anaesthetics. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997; 25: 611-614.
3. Wildsmith J A W, Mason A, McKinnon R P, Rae S M. Alleged allergy to local anaesthetic drugs. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 507-510.
4. Rood J P. Adverse reaction to dental local anaesthetic injection 'allergy' is not the cause. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 380-384.
5. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia, revised edition. 1995.
6. Fisher M. Skin testing and the anaesthetist. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 734-735.