Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 243-244

  Martyn, Christopher ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; EDITORIAL; FORGERY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

EID: 0037384157     PISSN: 14602725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg036     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. [http://www.faseb.org/opar/news/docs/nr10_xt10_xt2b.pdf].
2. Smith R. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Br Med J 1998; 316:1686-7.
3. Rennie D, Gunsalus CK. Regulations on scientific misconduct: lessons from the US experience. In: Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 3rd edn. London, BMJ Books, 2001.
4. Lock S. Research misconduct 1974-1990: an imperfect history. In: Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 3rd edn. London, BMJ Books, 2001.
5. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985; 14:32-8.
6. Adam D, Knight J. Publish and be damned ... Nature 2002; 419:772-6.
7. Riis P. The concept of scientific dishonesty: ethics, value systems, and research. In: Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 3rd edn. London, BMJ Books, 2001.