Complementing empirical evidence on global recycling and trade of waste paper

World Development

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 743-754

  Berglund, Christer ^a   Söderholm, Patrik ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Developed countries; Developing countries; Recycling; Trade; Utilization; Waste paper

Indexed keywords

RECYCLING; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037378627     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00007-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Atkinson, J., & Manning, N. (1995). A survey of international energy elasticities. In T. Barker et al. (Ed.), Global warming and energy demand. London: Routledge.
2. Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Baltagi, B. H., & Griffin, J. M. (1984). Short- and long-run effects in pooled models. International Economic Review, 25, 631-645.
4. Berglund, C., & Söderholm, P. (2002). An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Working Paper, Division of Economics, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
5. Edgren, J. A., & Moreland, K. W. (1989). An econometric analysis of paper and wastepaper Markets. Resources and Energy, 11, 299-319.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2001). FAO statistical databases, available at http://apps.fao.org.
7. Griffin, J. M. (1977). Inter-fuel substitution possibilities: a translog application to inter-country data. International Economic Review, 18(3), 755-770.
8. Huhtala, A., & Samakovlis, E. (1999). Does international harmonization of environmental policy instruments make economic sense? The case of paper recycling in Europe. Working Paper No. 65, National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.
9. International Energy Agency (IEA) (1999). World energy outlook. Looking at energy subsidies: getting the prices right, Paris: OECD.
10. Lee, M., & Ma, H.-O. (2001). Substitution possibility between unpriced pulp and wastepaper in the US. Paper and paperboard industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 18, 251-273.
11. MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29, 305-325.
12. Nestor, D. V. (1991). Increasing the rate of recycling when demand is price-inelastic: a case study of the market for old newspapers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA
13. Nestor, D. V. (1992). Partial static equilibrium model of newsprint recycling. Applied Economics, 24, 411-417.
14. Pindyck, R. (1979). Interfuel substitution and the industrial demand for energy: an international comparison. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 168-179.
15. Pulp & Paper International (1998). International fact & price book 1999. San Francisco: Miller Freeman.
16. Radetzki, M. (1994). Hard coal in Europe: perspectives on a global market distortion. OPEC Review, XVIII(2), 223-244.
17. Rehn, M. (1995). Technology in the pulp and paper industry empirical studies of scale economies, productivity growth and substitution possibilities, Report No. 13, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
18. Stapleton, D. C. (1981). Inferring long-term substitution possibilities from cross-section and time-series data. In E. R. Berndt, & B. C. Field (Eds.), Modeling and measuring natural resource substitution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Van Beukering, P. J., & Bouman, M. N. (2001). Empirical evidence on recycling and trade of paper and lead in developing countries. World Development, 29(10), 1717-1737.
20. Varian, H. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: Norton.
21. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48 817-838.
22. World Bank (2001). World Bank classification of economies, available at www.worldbank.org/data/archive/wdi/class.htm.