Percutaneous vasectomy: A simple modification eliminates the steep learning curve of no-scalpel vasectomy

Journal of Urology

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1434-1436

  Jones, J Stephen ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambulatory surgical procedure; Testis; Vasectomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE STERILIZATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECANALIZATION; SCALPEL; SUPINE POSITION; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAS DEFERENS; VASECTOMY;

EID: 0037377312     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000047366.58553.1c     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Li, S., Goldstein, M., Zhu, J. and Huber, D.: The no-scalpel vasectomy. J Urol, 145: 341, 1991
2. Haws, J. M., Morgan, G. T., Pollack, A. E., Koonin, L. M., Magnani, R. J. and Gargiullo, P. M.: Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995. Urology, 52: 685, 1998
3. Morrison, G. E. C. and Alderman, P. M.: Re: a comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries (letter to the editor). J Urol, 163: 1892, 2000
4. Holt, B. A. and Higgins, A. F.: Minimally invasive vasectomy. Br J Urol, 77: 585, 1996