Is pollen limited? The answer is blowin' in the wind

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 157-159

  Koenig, Walter D ^a   Ashley, Mary V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEMOPHILY; GENE FLOW; POLLEN; SEED PRODUCTION;

EID: 0037377044     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00034-X     Document Type: Short Survey

References (33)

1. Knapp E.E., et al. Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia. 128:2001;48-55.
2. Sork V.L., et al. Pollen movement in declining populations of California valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;1657-1668.
3. Satake A., Iwasa Y. Spatially limited pollen exchange and a long-range synchronization of trees. Ecology. 83:2002;993-1005.
4. Satake A., Iwasa Y. The synchronized and intermittent reproduction of forest trees is mediated by the Moran effect, only in association with pollen coupling. J. Ecol. 90:2002;830-838.
5. Smouse P.E., et al. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution. 55:2001;260-271.
6. ft, pollen dispersal, and inter-female distance. Genetics. 157:2001;851-857.
7. Austerlitz F., Smouse P.E. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. III. Impact of within-population structure. Genet. Res. 78:2001;271-278.
8. Vander Wall S.B. Food Hoarding in Animals. 1990;University of Chicago Press.
9. Satake A., Iwasa Y. Pollen coupling of forest trees: forming synchronized and periodic reproduction out of chaos. J. Theor. Biol. 203:2000;63-84.
10. Isagi Y., et al. How does masting happen and synchronize? J. Theor. Biol. 187:1997;231-239.
11. Ranta E., et al. The Moran effect and synchrony in population dynamics. Oikos. 78:1997;136-142.
12. Larson B.M.H., Barrett S.C.H. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 69:2000;503-520.
13. Janzen D.H. Seed predation by animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2:1971;465-492.
14. Kelly D., Sork V.L. Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:2002;427-447.
15. Smith C.C., et al. The advantage of mast years for wind pollination. Am. Nat. 136:1990;1795-1807.
16. Dow B.D., Ashley M.V. High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J. Hered. 89:1998;62-70.
17. Streiff R., et al. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus rober L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol. Ecol. 8:1999;831-841.
18. Dow B.D., Ashley M.V. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5:1996;120-132.
19. Berg E.E., Hamrick J.L. Fine-scale genetic structure of a turkey oak forest. Evolution. 49:1995;110-120.
20. Sork V.L., et al. Macrogeographic and fine-scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L. Ann. Sci. For. 50:1993;261s-270s.
21. Schnabel A., Hamrick J.L. Comparative analysis of population genetic structure in Quercus macrocarpa and Q. gambelii (Fagaceae). Syst. Bot. 15:1990;1.
22. Kumar A., Rogstad S.H. A hierarchical analysis of minisatellite DNA diversity in Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii Nutt Fagaceae). Mol. Ecol. 7:1998;859-869.
23. Sork V.L., et al. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 14:1999;219-224.
24. Kelly D. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;465-470.
25. Koenig W.D., Knops J.M.H. Scale of mast-seeding and tree-ring growth. Nature. 396:1998;225-226.
26. Curran L.M., Webb C.O. Experimental tests of the spatio-temporal scale of seed predation in mast-fruiting dipterocarpaceae. Ecol. Monogr. 77:2000;129-148.
27. Ostfeld R.S., Keesing F. Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;232-237.
28. Elkinton J.S., et al. Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology. 77:1996;2332-2342.
29. McShea W.J. The influence of acorn crops on annual variation in rodent and bird populations. Ecology. 1:2000;228-238.
30. Bolsinger C.L. The Hardwoods of California's Timberlands, Woodlands and Savannas. 1988;USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Resource Bulletin PNW-RB-148.
31. Standiford R.B. California's oak woodlands. McShea W.J., Healy W.M. Oak Forest Ecosystems. 2002;280-303 The Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Stahle D.W. The unsung ancients. Nat. Hist. 111:2002;48-53.
33. Mensing S. The impact of European settlement on blue oak (Quercus douglasii) regeneration and recruitment in the Tehachapi Mountains, California. Madroño. 39:1992;36-46.