The spanning set indicates that variability during the stance period of running is affected by footwear

Gait and Posture

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 132-135

  Kurz, Max J ^a   Stergiou, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Barefoot; Footwear; Locomotion; Spanning set methodology; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; KNEE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUNNING; SENSATION; SHOE; TREADMILL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANKLE JOINT; ANTHROPOMETRY; BIOMECHANICS; COHORT STUDIES; ENERGY TRANSFER; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; PROBABILITY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RUNNING; SHOES; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0037375297     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00064-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Nasher L.M. Balance adjustments of humans perturbed while walking. J. Neurophysiol. 44:(4):1980;650-664.
2. Ganevia S.C., Gurke D. Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements. Behav. Brain Sci. 15:1992;614-632.
3. Dingwell J.B., Ulbrecht J.S., Boch J., Becker M.B., O'Gorman J.T., Cavanagh P.R. Neuropathic gait shows only trends towards increased variability of sagittal plane kinematics during treadmill locomotion. Gait and Posture. 10:1999;21-29.
4. Hausdorff J.M., Mitchell S.L., Firtion R., Peng C.K., Cudkowicz M.E., Wei J.Y., et al. Altered fractal dynamics of gait: reduced stride-interval correlations with aging and Huntington's disease. J. Appl. Physiol. 82:(1):1997;262-269.
5. Hennig E.M., Gordon A., Liu Q.I. Biomechanical variables and the perception of cushioning for running in various types of footwear. J. Appl. Biomech. 12:1996;143-150.
6. Lake M.J., Lafortune M.A. Mechanical inputs related to perception of lower extremity impact loading severity. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise. 30:(1):1998;136-143.
7. Robbins S.E., Gouw G.J. Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise. 23:(2):1991;217-224.
8. Hamill J., van Emmerik R.E.A., Heiderscheit B.C., Lil A. Dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin. Biomech. 14:1999;297-308.
9. Lay D.C. Linear algebra and its applications. 1999;1999 Addison-Wesley, New York.
10. Areblad M., Nigg B.M., Ekstand J., Olsson K.O., Ekstrom H. Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. J. Biomech. 23:(9):1990;933-940.
11. Soutaus-Little R.W., Beavis G.C., Verstraete M.C., Marcus T.L. Analysis of foot motion during running using a joint coordinate system. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise. 19:1987;285-293.
12. Jackson K.M. Fitting of mathematical functions to biomechanical data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 26:1979;515-521.
13. Jeng S.F., Liao H.F., Lai J.S., Hou J.W. Optimization of walking in children. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise. 29:(3):1997;370-376.
14. Zar J.H. Biostatistical analysis. 1999;Prentice-Hall:Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
15. De Clercq D.L., Aerts P., Kunnen M. The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study. J. Biomech. 27:1994;1213-1222.