Proficiency testing for sensory ranking panels: Measuring panel performance

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 247-256

  McEwan, Jean A ^a   Heiniö, Raija Liisa ^b   Hunter, E Anthony ^c   Lea, Per ^d  

^a CAMPDEN BRI   (United Kingdom)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^c JCMB   (United Kingdom)

^d NORWEGIAN FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

Author keywords

Expected results; Panel performance; Proficiency testing; Ranking

Indexed keywords

APPLE JUICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SWEETNESS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 0037375083     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00083-6     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. ESN. (1996). A European sensory and consumer study. A case study on coffee. UK: CCFRA.
3. ISO 8587 (1988). Sensory analysis. Methodology - Ranking.
4. Hunter, E. A., & McEwan, J. A. (1998). Evaluation of an international ring trial for sensory profiling of hard cheese. Food Quality and Preference, 9(5), 343-354.
5. Kendall, M., & Gibbons, J. D. (1990). Rank correlation methods (5th Ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
6. Lyon, D. H. (2001). International guidelines for proficiency testing in sensory analysis. CCFRA Guideline 35. Campden & Chorleywood Food Research Association.
7. McEwan, J. A. (2000a). Proficiency testing for sensory ranking tests: statistical guidelines. Part 1. R&D Report No. 118. CCFRA.
8. McEwan, J. A. (2000b). Proficiency testing for sensory profile tests: statistical guidelines. Part 1. R&D Report No. 119. CCFRA.
9. McEwan, J. A. (2001a). Proficiency testing for sensory ranking tests: statistical guidelines. Part 2. R&D Report No. 126. CCFRA.
10. McEwan, J. A. (2001b). Proficiency testing for sensory profile tests: statistical guidelines. Part 2. R&D Report No. 127. CCFRA.
11. McEwan, J. A., Hunter, A. E., van Gemert, L. J., & Lea, P. (2002). Proficiency testing for sensory profile panels: measuring panel performance. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 181-190.
12. Næs, T. (1998). Detecting individual differences among assessors and differences among replicates in sensory profiling. Food Quality and Preference, 3, 107-110.
13. O'Mahony, M. (1986). Sensory evaluation of food: statistical methods and procedures. New York: Marcel Dekker.
14. Pagès, J., & Husson, F. (2001). Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles: methodology and results. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 297-309.
15. Rossi, F. (2001). Assessing sensory panelist performance using repeatability and reproducibility measures. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 467-497.