A comparison of hyperbaric 1% and 3% solutions of small-dose lidocaine in spinal anesthesia

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 881-884

  Kawamata, Yurie Tohdoh ^a   Nishikawa, Koki ^a   Kawamata, Tomoyuki ^a   Omote, Keiichi ^a   Igarashi, Motohiko ^a   Yamauchi, Masanori ^a   Sato, Koichi ^a   Nakayama, Masayasu ^a   Namiki, Akiyoshi ^a  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPHEDRINE; LIDOCAINE; MIDAZOLAM;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA MECHANISM; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG FORMULATION; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION DISORDER; NERVE BLOCK; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM SURGERY; RELATIVE DENSITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL ANESTHESIA;

EID: 0037372678     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048825.49189.B3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ewert MC, Rubin AP. Subarachnoid block with hyperbaric lignocaine: a comparison with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Anaesthesia 1987;42:1183-7.
2. Ben-David B, Levin H, Solomon E, et al. Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution. Anesth Analg 1996;83:716-20.
3. Liu SS. Optimizing spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. Reg Anesth 1997;22:500-10
4. Urmey WF, Stanton J, Peterson M, Sharrock NE. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for outpatient surgery: dose-response characteristics of intrathecal isobaric lidocaine using a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. Anesthesiology 1995;83: 528-34.
5. Liam BL, Yim CF, Chong JL. Dose response study of lidocaine 1% for spinal anaesthesia for lower limb and perineal surgery. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:645-50.
6. Morisaki H, Masuda J, Kaneko S, et al. Transient neurologic syndrome in one thousand forty-five patients after 3% lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1998;86:1023-6.
7. Manica VS, Bader AM, Fragneto R, et al. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: a comparison of 1.5% and 5% spinal lidocaine for ultrasonically guided oocyte retrieval. Anesth Analg 1993;77: 453-6.
8. Van Zundert AA, Grouls RJ, Korsten HH, Lambert DH. Spinal anesthesia: volume or concentration - what matters? Reg Anesth 1996;21:112-8.
9. Sheskey MC, Rocco AG, Bizzarri-Schmid M, et al. A dose-response study of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1983;62:931-5.
10. Logan MR, McClure JH, Wildsmith JA. Plain bupivacaine: an unpredictable spinal anaesthetic agent. Br J Anaesth 1986;58: 292-6.
11. Van Zundert AA, De Wolf AM. Extent of anesthesia and hemodynamic effects after subarachnoid administration of bupivacaine with epinephrine. Anesth Analg 1988;67:784-7.
12. Van Gessel EF, Praplan J, Fuchs T, et al. Influence of injection speed on the subarachnoid distribution of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Anesth Analg 1993;77:483-7.
13. Carpenter RL, Hogan QH, Liu SS, et al. Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89:24-9.