A post audit of a model-designed ground water extraction system

Ground Water

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 212-218

  Andersen, Peter F ^a   Lu, Silong ^a  

^a GeoTrans Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; AQUIFERS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

GROUND WATER EXTRACTION SYSTEMS;

GROUNDWATER;

GROUNDWATER ABSTRACTION; MODEL; PUMPING; WATER LEVEL;

ARTICLE; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; ENGINEERING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOIL; THEORETICAL MODEL; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

ENGINEERING; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REFUSE DISPOSAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOIL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 0037372087     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02584.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alley, W.M., and P.A. Emery. 1986. Ground water model of the Blue River Basin, Nebraska-Twenty years later. Journal of Hydrology 85, 225-249.
2. Anderson, M.P., and W.W. Woessner. 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling. Academic Press.
3. Konikow, L.F. 1986. Predictive accuracy of a ground water model: Lessons from a post audit. Ground Water 24, no. 2: 173-184.
4. Konikow, L.F., and M.A. Person. 1985. Assessment of long-term salinity changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system. Water Resources Research 21, no. 11: 1611-1624.
5. Konikow, L.F., and L.A. Swain. 1990. Assessment of predictive accuracy of a model of artificial recharge effects in the upper Coachella Valley, California. In Selected Papers on Hydrogeology from the 28th International Geological Congress, vol. 1, ed. E.S. Simpson and J.M. Sharp Jr. International Association of Hydrogeologists. Hannover, Germany: Heinz Heise Verlag.
6. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resource Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1. http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/modflow2000.html.
7. Pollack, D.W. 1994. User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATHPLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processor for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground water flow model. Open-File Report 94-464. http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/modflow2000.html.
8. Prickett, T.A., and C.G. Lonnequist. 1971. Selected digital computer techniques for ground water resources evaluation: Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 55.
9. Stewart, M.T., and C. Langevin. 1999. Post audit of a numerical prediction of wellfield drawdown in a semiconfined aquifer system. Ground Water 37, no 2: 245-252.
10. U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency. 1993. Milan Army Ammunition Plant, O-Line Ponds Area Feasibility Study-Hydrogeologic Investigation Report. Prepared by ICF Kaiser.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. NPL Site Narrative at Listing, Milan Army Ammunition Plant, www. epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar495.htm