Revisiting the logical and research considerations of competitive advantage

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 279-284

  Arend, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive advantage; Philosophy of science; Strategy theory

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; PERFORMANCE; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LOGICAL CAUSATION; STRATEGY RESEARCH;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037371344     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.285     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Atlman EI. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance 23(4): 589-609.
2. Altman EI. 1994. Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. John Wiley: New York.
3. Altman EI, Haldeman RG, Narayanan P. 1977. Zeta analysis: a new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance 1: 29-54.
4. Amit RH, Schoemaker PJH. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46.
5. Andrews KR. 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin: Homewood, IL.
6. Arend RJ. 2000. Strategic liabilities: the other side of the ledger. New York University working paper.
7. Barney JB. 1986. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science 32: 1231-1241.
8. Barney JB. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99-120.
9. Brush CG, Greene PG, Hart MM, Haller HS. 2001. From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive 15(1): 64-78.
10. Cameron KS, Whetten DA, Kim M. 1987. Organizational dysfunctions of decline. Academy of Management Journal 30: 126-138.
11. Conner KR. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management 17: 121-154.
12. D'Aveni RA. 1989. The aftermath of organizational decline: a longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. Academy of Management Journal 32: 577-605.
13. D'Aveni RA. 1995. Coping with hypercompetition: utilizing the new 7S's framework. Academy of Management Executive 9(3): 45-60.
14. Grant R. 1988. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Blackwell: Malden, MA.
15. Hambrick DC, D'Aveni RA. 1992. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science 38: 1445-1466.
16. Kizner I. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
17. Kuhn T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
18. Lang LHP, Stulz RM. 1992. Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of banckruptcy announcements. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 45-60.
19. Leonard-Barton D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 13: 111-125.
20. Lieberman M, Montgomery DB. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 9: 41-58.
21. Ohlson JS. 1980. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research 19: 109-131.
22. Penrose ET. 1959: The Theory of Growth of the Firm. Wiley: New York.
23. Peteraf MA. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179-191.
24. Porter M. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York.
25. Powell TC. 2001. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal 22(9): 875-888.
26. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
27. Williamson OE. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. Free Press: New York.
28. Williamson OE. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233-261.