Performance change of mammographic CAD schemes optimized with most-recent and prior image databases

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 283-288

  Zheng, Bin ^a   Good, Walter F ^a   Armfield, Derek R ^a   Cohen, Cathy ^a   Hertzberg, Todd ^a   Sumkin, Jules H ^a   Gur, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast radiography; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE;

EID: 0037369898     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80102-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. Beyond randomized trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality. Cancer 2001; 91:1724-1731.
2. Feig S. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years. Cancer 1997; 80:2035-2039.
3. Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Bird RE, Desrochers DA. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:535-541.
4. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202.
5. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Böhm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:2454-2459.
6. Lechner M, Nelson M, Elvecrog E. Comparison of two commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. Appl Radiol 2002; 31:31-35.
7. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786.
8. Moberg K, Bjurstam N, Wilczek B, Rostgard L, Egge E, Muren C. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2001; 39:104-110.
9. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. Radiology 1998; 207:465-471.
10. Malich A, Azhari T, Böhm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Reproducibility: an important factor determining the quality of computer aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36:170-174.
11. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, et al. Soft-copy mammographic reading with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001; 221:633-640.
12. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:29-33.
13. Bassett LW, Shayestehfar B, Hirbawi I. Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and cost. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:1083-1086.
14. Callaway MP, Boggis CR, Astley SA. Influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:527-529.
15. Zheng B, Chang YH, Gur D. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:959-966.
16. Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, Maltz GS, Chang YH, Gur D. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:595-602.
17. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Gurcan M. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computeraided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. Med Phys 2001; 28:2309-2317.
18. Zheng B, Shah R, Wallace L, Hakim C, Ganott MA, Gur D. Computeraided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1245-1250.
19. Zheng B, Chang YH, Wang XH, Good WF, Gur D. Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm. Acad Radiol 1999; 6:327-332.
20. Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering. Med Phys 2001; 28:2302-2308.
21. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1033-1053.
22. Towell G, Shavlik J. An approach to combining explanation-based and neural learning algorithms. Connection Sci 1989; 1:233-255.
23. Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Adequacy testing of training set sample sizes in the development of a computer-assisted diagnosis scheme. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:497-502.
24. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Feature selection with limited datasets. Med Phys 1999; 26:2176-2182.