Optimal distance for segmental nerve conduction studies revisited

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 367-369

  Landau, Mark E ^a   Diaz, Myrna I ^a   Barner, Kristen C ^a   Campbell, William W ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrodiagnosis; Entrapment neuropathy; Mononeuropathy; Neural conduction; Neurophysiology

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FOREARM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIME; ULNAR NERVE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, NEUROLOGICAL; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULNAR NERVE;

EID: 0037369525     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mus.10297     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. Maynard FM, Stolov WC. Experimental error in determination of nerve conduction velocity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53:362-372.