An econometric analysis of trade diversion under NAFTA

North American Journal of Economics and Finance

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-24

  Fukao, Kyoji ^a   Okubo, Toshihiro ^a   Stern, Robert M ^b  

^a HITOTSUBASHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

NAFTA; Trade diversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037368813     PISSN: 10629408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1062-9408(02)00118-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arndt, S., & and Huemer, A. (2001, 2002). North American Trade after NAFTA: Part I, Part II, and Part III. Claremont Policy Briefs, 01-01, 01-02, & 02-01. Claremont Graduate University.
2. Agama, L., & McDaniel, C. A. (2002, October). The NAFTA preference and US-Mexico trade (in preparation).
3. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportions theory of international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143-153.
4. Burfisher, M. E., Robinson, S., & Thierfelder, K. (2001). The impact of NAFTA on the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 125-144.
5. Coughlin, C. C., &Wall, H. J. (2000, October). NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports. Working Paper 2000-029. Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
6. Fukao, K., Okubo, T., & Stern, R. M. (2003). Trade diversion under NAFTA. In Robert M. Stern (Ed.), Japan's economic recovery: Commercial policy, monetary policy, and corporate governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
7. Gould, D. M. (1998). Has NAFTA changed North American trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Economic Review, First Quarter, 12-23.
8. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-162.
9. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. James, W. E., & Umemoto, M. (1999, January). Rules of origin and the competitive position of Asian Textiles and apparel producers in the North American market. ICSEAD Working Paper Series, 99-1.
11. James, W. E., & Umemoto, M. (2000). NAFTA trade with East Asia: Rules of origin and market access in textiles, apparel, footwear, and electrical machinery. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 17, 293-309.
12. Karemara, D., & Ojah, K. (1998). An industrial analysis of trade creation and diversion effects of NAFTA. Journal of Economic Integration, 13, 400-425.
13. Krueger, A. O. (1993). Free trade agreements as protectionist devices: Rules of origin. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4342.
14. Krueger, A. O. (1999a). Are preferential trading agreements trade-liberalizing or protectionist? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 105-124.
15. Krueger, A.O. (1999b, December). Trade creation and trade diversion under NAFTA. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7429.
16. Krueger, A. O. (2000). NAFTA's effects: A preliminary assessment. The World Economy, 23, 761-775.
17. Lustig, N. (2001). Life is not easy: Mexico's quest for stability and growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 85-106.
18. Manning, W. G., Duan, N., & Rogers,W. H. (1987). Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. Journal of Econometrics, 35, 59-82.
19. Markusen, J. (1986). Explaining the volume of trade: An eclectic approach. American Economic Review, 76, 1002-1011.
20. Romalis, J. (2001). NAFTA's impact on North American trade (in preparation).
21. Soloaga, I., & Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1-29.
22. Wall, H. J. (2002). Has Japan been left out in the cold by regional integration? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Review, 84, 25-36.