The determinants of spatial concentration: The manufacturing and service sectors in an international perspective

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 41-63

  Braunerhjelm, Pontus ^a   Johansson, Dan ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Stockholm School of Economics   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL AGGLOMERATION; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; MANUFACTURING; SERVICE SECTOR;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0037368040     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1366271032000068096     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amiti, M. 1998: New trade theories and industrial locations in the EU: a survey of evidence, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14: 45-53.
2. Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs, Z. 1997: Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics, 42: 422-448.
3. Audretsch, D. 1995: Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
4. Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. 1996: R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review, 86: 630-640.
5. Audretsch, D. and Stephan, P. 1996: Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology, American Economic Review, 86: 641-652.
6. Barkely, D. 1988: The decentralization of high-technology manufacturing to non-metropolitan areas, Growth and Change (Winter): 14-30.
7. Berman, E., Bound, J. and Griliches, Z. 1994: Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing: evidence from the annual survey of manufactures, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 367-398.
8. Brainard, S. 1993: A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER WP, No. 4269.
9. Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B. 1999: Industry clusters in Ohio and Sweden, 1975-1995, Small Business Economics, 12: 279-293.
10. Braunerhjelm, P. and Svensson, R. 1996: Host country characteristics and agglomeration in foreign direct investments, Applied Economics, 27: 833-840.
11. Braunerhjelm, P., Faini, R., Norman, V., Ruane, F. and Seabright, P. 2000: Integration and the Regions of Europe: How the Right Policies Can Prevent Polarization, Monitoring European Integration 10. London: CEPR.
12. Ciccone, A. and Hall, R. 1996: Productivity and the density of economic activity, American Economic Review, 86: 54-70.
13. Davis, D. 1999: The home market, trade and industrial structure, American Economic Review, 88: 1264-1277.
14. Davis, S. and Henrekson, M. 1999: Explaining national differences in the size and industry distribution of employment, Small Business Economics, 12: 59-83.
15. Dieprink, H. and Nijkamp, P. 1988: Innovative behavior, agglomeration economies and R&D infrastructure, Empirical Economics, 13: 35-57.
16. Dumais, G., Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. 1997: Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. NBER WP, No. 6270.
17. Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. 1994: Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. NBER WP, No. 4840.
18. Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. 1997: Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach, Journal of Political Economy, 105: 889-927.
19. Feldman, M. 1994: The Geography of Innovation. Boston and Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1999: The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Griliches, Z. 1979: Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92-116.
22. Haaland, J., Kind, H., Midelfart-Knarvik, K. and Torstensson, J. 1998: What determines the economic geography of Europe? Discussion Paper 19/98, Bergen.
23. Hansen, E. 1990: Agglomeration economies and industrial decentralization: the wage-productivity trade-off, Journal of Urban Economics, 28: 140-159.
24. Hanson, G. 1998: North American integration and industry location, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14: 401-419.
25. Harrison, B. 1992: Industrial districts: old wines in new bottles, Regional Studies, 26: 469-483.
26. Henrekson, M. and Johansson, D. 1999: Institutional effects on the evolution of the size distribution of firms, Small Business Economics, 12: 11-23.
27. Isard, W. 1956: Location and Space Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Jaffe, A. 1989: Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, 79: 957-970.
29. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and Hendersson, R. 1993: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 577-598.
30. Kim, S. 1995: Expansion of markets and the geographical distribution of economic activities: the trends in the U.S. manufacturing industries, 1860-1987, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 881-908.
31. Kim, S. 1999: Urban development in the United States, 1690-1990. NBER WP, No. 7120.
32. Krugman, P. 1991a: Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Krugman, P. 1991b: Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-500.
34. Markusen, A. 1996: Sticky places and slippery places: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72: 293-313.
35. Markusen, A., Hall, P. and Glasmeir, A. 1986: High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of Sunrise Industries. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
36. Markusen, J. 1995: Incorporating the multinational enterprise into the theory of international trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 169-189.
37. Marshall, A. 1890: Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
38. Maurel, F. and Sedillot, B. 1999: A measure of the geographic concentration in French manufacturing industries, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 5.
39. Midelfart-Knarvik, K.H., Overman, H., Redding, S. and Venables, A. 2000: The location of European industries. Report prepared for the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission.
40. Myrdal, G. 1957: Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Methuen.
41. Porter, M. 1998: On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Puga, D. 1999: The rise and fall of regional inequalities, European Economic Review, 43: 303-335.
43. Saxenian, A. 1994: Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Statistics Sweden (SCB) 1975, 1993: Data from the Central Register of Enterprises and Establishments, 1975 and 1993.
45. Statistics Sweden (SCB) 1977: The Annual Report of Manufacturing 1975. Örebro.
46. Statistics Sweden (SCB) 1995: The Annual Report of Manufacturing 1993. Örebro.
47. Storper, M. and Walker, R. 1989: The spatial division of labor: labor and the location of industries, in L. Sawers and W. Tabb (eds.), Sunbelt/Snowbelt: Urban Development and Regional Restructuring. New York. Oxford University Press.
48. Sweeney, R. 1987: Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development. New York: St Martin's Press.
49. Thomas, M. 1985: Regional economic development and the role of innovation and technological change, in A. Thwaites and R. Oakley (eds.), The Regional Economic Impact of Technological Change. New York: St Martin's Press.
50. Tran, D. 1986: Locational factors in the declining industrial competitive advantage of the New York urban region, Journal of Regional Sciences, 26: 121-139.
51. Varga, A. 1998: Regional Economic Effects of University Research: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
52. Venables, A. 1996: Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review, 37: 41-59.
53. Weber, A. 1909: Theory of Location of Industries (translated 1929). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Wheaton, W. and Shisido, H. 1981: Urban concentration, agglomeration economies, and the level of economic development, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 3: 17-30.
55. White, H. 1980: A heteroscedastisity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity, Econometrica, 48: 817-838.