A framework for developing a coding scheme for meta-analysis

Western Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 205-222

  Brown, Sharon A ^a   Upchurch, Sandra L ^b   Acton, Gayle J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Coding; Meta analysis; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; META ANALYSIS; NURSING; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SELF CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; METHODOLOGY; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037365578     PISSN: 01939459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193945902250038     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. American Diabetes Association. (2001). Clinical practice recommendations: Introduction. Diabetes Care, 24 (Suppl. 1), S1-S2.
2. Brown, S. A. (1988). Effects of educational interventions in diabetes care: A meta-analysis of findings. Nursing Research, 37, 223-230.
3. Brown, S. A. (1990a). Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: A meta-analysis revisited. Patient Education and Counseling, 16, 198-215.
4. Brown, S. A. (1990b). Quality of reporting in diabetes patient education research: 1954-1989. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 53-62.
5. Brown, S. A. (1991). Measuring quality of primary studies for meta-analysis: A realistic yet rigorous approach. Nursing Research, 40, 352-355.
6. Brown, S. A. (1992). Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: Variations in intervention effects across studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 409-419.
7. Brown, S. A., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Predicting metabolic control in diabetes: A pilot study using meta-analysis to estimate a linear model. Nursing Research, 43, 362-368.
8. Brown, S. A., Upchurch, S., Anding, R., Winter, M., & Ramírez, G. (1996). Promoting weight loss in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care, 19, 613-624.
9. Clarke, M., &, Oxman, A. D. (Eds.). (2002). Cochrane reviewers, handbook 4.1.5. In The Cochrane Library (Issue 2). Retrieved August 26, 2002, from www.cochrane.org/cochrane/ hbook.htm
10. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Potentials and limitations of research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
11. Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Sterne, J. A. (2001). Uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Clinical Medicine, 1, 478-84.
12. Funnell, M. M., & Haas, L. B. (1995). National standards for diabetes self-management education programs. Diabetes Care, 18, 100-116.
13. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Manser, R., & Walters, E. H. (2001). What is evidence-based medicine and the role of the systematic review: The revolution coming your way. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, 56, 33-38.
15. Miller, N., & Pollock, V. E. (1994). Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
16. Mulrow, C. D., & Lohr, K. N. (2001). Proof and policy from medical research evidence. Journal of Health Politics, 26, 249-266.
17. Padgett, D., Mumford, E., Hynes, M., & Carter, R. (1988). Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychosocial interventions on management of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1007-1030.
18. Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C. W., de Bie, R. A., Kessels, A. G. H., Boers, M., Bouter, L. M., & Knipschild, P. G. (1998). The Delphi List: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1235-1241.