A waveform generation model-based approach for segregation of monaural mixed sound

Signal Processing

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 561-574

  Sasou, Akira ^a   Tanaka, Kazuyo ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auto regressive hidden Markov model (AR HMM); Sound recognition; Sound source separation; Template model adaptation; Waveform generation model

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; MARKOV PROCESSES; MICROPHONES; SPEECH RECOGNITION; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

MONAURAL CONCURRENT SOUNDS;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

EID: 0037363459     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(02)00486-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Akaike H. A new-look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. AC-19(6):1974;716-723.
2. Baum L.E. An inequality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation of probabilistic function of a Markov process. Inequalities. 3:1972;1-8.
3. de Cheveigne A. Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds. fundamental frequency estimation and a time-domain cancellation model of auditory processing J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 93(6):June 1993;3271-3290.
4. Dudgeon D.E. Array Signal Processing. 1993;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Kashino K., Murase H. A sound source identification system for ensemble music based on template adaptation and music stream extraction. Speech Commun. 27(3-4):1999;337-349.
6. S. Nakamura, K. Hiyane, F. Asano, T. Nishimura, T. Yamada, Acoustical sound database in real environments for sound scene understanding and hands-free speech recognition, Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2000, pp. 965-968.
7. Nehorai A., Porat B. Adaptive comb filtering for harmonic signal enhancement. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 34(5):October 1986;1124-1138.
8. Nomura H., Kaneda Y., Kojima J. Microphone array for near sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Japan. 53(2):1997;110-116.
9. Parson T.W. Separation of speech from interfering speech by means of harmonic selection. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 60(4):October 1976;911-918.
10. Santhanam B., Maragos P. Harmonic analysis and restoration of separation methods for periodic signal mixtures. algebraic separation versus comb filtering Signal Processing. 69:1998;81-91.
11. A. Sasou, K. Tanaka, Glottal excitation modeling using HMM with application to robust analysis of speech signal, Proceedings of ICSLP2000, Vol. IV, October 2000, pp. 704-707.
12. A. Sasou, K. Tanaka, Robust LP analysis using glottal source HMM with application to high-pitched and noise-corrupted speech, Proceedings of EuroSpeech 2001, Vol. 4, September 2001, pp. 2443-2446.
13. Stubbs R.J., Summerfield Q. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 84(4):October 1988;1236-1249.
14. A.P. Varga, R.K. Moore, Hidden Markov model decomposition of speech and noise, Proceedings of ICASSP-90, 1990, pp. 845-848.
15. Viterbi A.J. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. IT-13(2):April 1967;260-269.