A chemical class-based approach to predictive model generation

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 568-578

  Miller, David W ^a  

^a Sage Informatics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PREDICTIVE MODEL GENERATION;

DATA REDUCTION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; NEURAL NETWORKS; TOXICITY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

DRUG PRODUCTS;

EID: 0037361956     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci025606g     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Mansch, C.; Muir, R. M.; Fujita, T.; Maloney, P. P.; Geiger, E.; Streich, M. The Correlation of Biological Activity of Plant Growth Regulators and Chloromycetin Derivatives with Hammett Constants and Partition Coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2817-2824.
2. Fujita, T.; Iwasa, J.; Hansch, C. A. New Substituent Constant, π, Derived From Partition Coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 5175-5180.
3. Burden, F. R. Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Biological Activity from Simple Molecular Structural Considerations. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1996, 15, 7-11.
4. King, R. D.; Hirst, J. D.; Sternberg, M. J. E. New Approaches to QSAR: Neural Networks and Machine Learning. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 1993, 1, 279-290.
5. Zupan, J.; Gasteiger, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry and Drug Design; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
6. Greene, N.; Judson, P. N.; Langowski, J. J.; Marchant, C. A. Knowledge-Based Expert Systems for Toxicity and Metabolism Prediction: DEREK, StAR, and METEOR. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1999, 10, 299-314.
7. Enslein, K.; Gombar, V. K.; Blake, B. W. Use of SAR in Computer-Assisted Prediction of Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity of Chemicals by the TOPKAT Program. Mutat. Res. 1994, 305, 47-61.
8. Klopman, G. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Structure-Activity Studies. Computer Automated Structure Evaluation of Biological Activity of Organic Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7315-7321.
9. Rusinko, A., III.; Farmen, M. W.; Lambert, C. G.; Brown, P. L.; Young, S. S. Analysis of a Large Structure/Biological Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1017-1026.
10. Chen, X.; Rusinko, A., III.; Young, S. S. Recursive Partitioning Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1054-1062.
11. Miller, D. W. Results of a New Classification Algorithm Combining K Nearest Neighbors and Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 168-175.
12. Stantpn, D. T.; Morris, T. W.; Roychoudhury, S.; Parker, C. N. Application of Nearest-Neighbor and Cluster Analyses in Pharmaceutical Lead Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 21-27.
13. 1 Antagonists Using Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, Genetic Algorithms-Partial Least-Squares, and K Nearest Neighbor Methods. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3217-3226.
14. Goodwin, J. T.; Mao, B.; Vidmar, T. J.; Conradi, R. A.; Burton, P. S. Strategies Toward Predicting Peptide Cellular Permeability From Computed Molecular Descriptors. J. Peptide Res. 1999, 53, 355-369.
15. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C.; Tolan, J. W.; Muskal, S. M. Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 726-735.
16. Palm, K.; Luthman, K.; Ungell, A.; Strandlund, G.; Beigi, F.; Lundahl, P.; Artursson, P. Evaluation of Dynamic Polar Molecular Surface Area as Predictor of Drug Absorption; Comparison with Other Computational and Experimental Predictors. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5382-5392.
17. Klopman, G.; Frierson, M. R.; Rosenkranz, H. S. The Structural Basis of the Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Salmonella Typhimurium: The Gene-Tox Data Base. Mutat. Res. 1990, 228, 1-50.
18. Ajay; Walters, W. P.; Murcko, M. A. Can We Learn To Distinguish Between "Drug-Like" and "Nondrug-Like" Molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
19. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating Between Drugs and Nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
20. Dearden, J. C.; Barratt, M. D.; Benigni, R.; Bristol, D. W.; Combes, R. D.; Cronin, M. T. D.; Judson, P. N.; Payne, M. P.; Richard, A. M.; Tichy, M.; Worth, A. P.; Yourick, J. J. The Development and Validation of Expert Systems for Predicting Toxicity. The Report and Recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 24. http://www.jhsph.edu/̃altweb/science/pubs/ECVAM/ecvam24.htm.
21. Kubinyi, H. QSAR: Hansch Analysis and Related Approaches; VCH Publishers: New York, 1993.
22. Devillers, J. Comparative QSAR; Taylor & Francis; Washington, DC, 1998.
23. Bajorath, J. Selected Concepts and Investigations in Compound Classification, Molecular Descriptor Analysis, and Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 233-245.
24. Cramer, R. D. III.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
25. Gao, H.; Williams, C.; Labute, P.; Bajorath, J. Binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of estrogen receptor ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 164-168.
26. Zheng, W.; Tropsha, A. Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest-Neighbor Principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
27. Klopman, G.; Tu, M. Diversity Analysis of 14156 Molecules Tested by the National Cancer Institute for Anti-HIV Activity Using the Quantitative Structure-Activity Relational Expert System MCASE. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 992-998.
28. Roberts, G.; Myatt, G. J.; Johnson, W. P.; Cross, K. P.: Blower, P. E. LeadScope: Software for Exploring Large Sets of Screening Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1302-1314.
29. Blower, P.; Fligner, M.; Verducci, J.; Bjoraker, J. On Combining Recursive Partitioning and Simulated Annealing To Detect Groups of Biologically Active Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 393-404.
30. For information regarding the ChemTK application, contact the author at dmiller@sageinformatics.com, or visit the Sage Informatics website at http://www.sageinformatics.com.
31. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://www.nci.nih.gov.
32. Livingstone, D. J. The Characterization of Chemical Structures Using Molecular Properties. A Survey. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 195-209.
33. Greene, J.; Kahn. S.; Savoj, H.; Sprague, P.; Teig, S. Chemical Function Queries for 3D Database Search. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1297-1308.
34. Breiman, L.; Friedman, J. H.; Olshen, R. A.; Stone, C. J. Classification and Regression Trees; Wadsworth: Monterey, CA, 1984.
35. Cherkassky, V. S.; Mulier, F. Learning From Data. Concepts, Theory, and Methods; Wiley & Sons; New York, 1998.
36. Figueras, J. Ring Perception Using Breadth-First Search. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 986-991.
37. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D. A Method for Visualizing Recurrent Topological Substructures in Sets of Active Molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 915-924.
38. Nicolaou, C. A.; Tamura, S. Y.; Kelley, B. P.; Bassett, S. I.; Nutt, R. F. Analysis of Large Screening Data Sets via Adaptively Grown Phylogenetic-Like Trees. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, in press.
39. Slum, A. L.; Langley, P. Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning. Artificial Intelligence 1997, 97, 245-271.
40. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Johnson, M., Maggiora, G. M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990.
41. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
42. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
43. Cho, S. J.; Shen, C. F.; Hermsmeier, M. A. Binary Formal Inference-Based Recursive Modeling Using Multiple Atom and Physiochemical Property Class Pair and Torsion Descriptors as Decision Criteria. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 668-680.
44. Srinivasan, J.; Castellino, A.; Bradley, E. K.; Eksterowicz, J. E.; Grootenhuis, P. D. J.: Putta, S.; Stanton, R. V. Evaluation of a Novel Shape-Based Computational Filter for Lead Evolution: Application to Thrombin Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2494-2500.