Erratum to: Current equipment alarm sounds: friend or foe? (Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, (2003), 50, 3, (209-214), 10.1007/BF03017786);Current equipment alarm sounds: Friend or foe?

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 209-214

  Dain, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALARM MONITOR; ANESTHESIST; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIOSENSOR; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL STAFF; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETER; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0037359848     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03018664     Document Type: Erratum

References (7)

1. Mondor T, Findlay A. Perceived urgency of auditory warning alarms used in the hospital operating room. Can J Anesth 2002: 221-28.
2. Momtahan K, Hetu R, Tansley B. Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. Ergonomics 1993; 36: 1159-76.
3. Loeb RG, Jones BR, Leonard RA, Behrman K. Recognition accuracy of current operating room alarms. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 499-505.
4. Lawless ST. Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 981-5.
5. Tsien CL, Fackler JC. Poor prognosis for existing monitors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 614-9.
6. Wallace MS, Ashman MN, Matjasko MJ. Hearing acuity of anesthesiologists and alarm detection. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 13-28.
7. FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/search.cfm