What actors think of Joint Forest Management: A perceptual analysis

International Forestry Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 53-57

  Rishi, P ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREST MANAGEMENT   (India)

Author keywords

Actors; India; Institutionalisation; JFM; Perception

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY FORESTRY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION;

INDIA;

EID: 0037356818     PISSN: 14655489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1505/IFOR.5.1.53.17431     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. GOVERNMENT of INDIA 1988. National Forest Policy
2. IIFM 1999. Process Documentation of Joint Forest Management. A consultancy Report of IIFM to World Bank assisted M.P. Forestry Project, Government of Madhya Pradesh.
3. MASLOW, A.H. 1947. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50: 370-396.
4. MUKHERJEE, N. 1997. Why JFM failed to deliver? A case study of Arjuni Mouza. Midnapour. Indian Forester, 123(6): 546-555.
5. PALIT, S. 1996. Indian FDs to translations. In village voices forest choices ed. Proffenberger, M. New Delhi. Oxford.
6. PARUL, R. 2002. Leading JFM through Nurturance. International Forestry Review (In Press)
7. PRATIMA, A. and JATTAN, S.S. 1999. Participatory Forest Management to meet basic needes of forest dependent communities. Indian Forester, 125(9): 895-901.
8. ROY, S.D. 1997. Social Indications towards Institutionalisation of Development Programme: A case study from Joint Forest Management. Indian Forester, 123 (6): 519-526.