Budgeting for research and development: A dynamic financial simulation approach

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-27

  Heidenberger, Kurt ^a   Schillinger, Alexander ^b   Stummer, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Trust Consult   (Austria)

Author keywords

Corporate finance; Decision support system; Dynamic simulation; Product and process innovation; Research and development budgeting

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0037356765     PISSN: 00380121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00003-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. OECD. Main Science and Technology Indicators-2001/1. OECD, Paris, 2001.
2. IBM. IBM Annual Report 2000. IBM, New York, 2001.
3. Heidenberger K, Muthsam HL, Stummer C. Budgetierungsansätze für Forschung und Entwicklung im Überblick. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 2000;70:1005-29.
4. Brockhoff K. A simulation model of R&D budgeting. R&D Management 1989;19:265-75.
5. Venkatraman R, Venkatraman S. R&D project selection and scheduling for organizations facing product obsolescence. R&D Management 1995;25:57-70.
6. Foster RN. Innovation: The attacker's advantage. New York: Summit, 1986.
7. Twiss B. Managing technological innovation, 4th ed. London: Longman, 1992.
8. Pearl R, Reed LJ. The rate of growth of the population of the United States since 1790 and its mathematical representation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1920;6:275-88.
9. Bridge RC, Martin RJ. APPLE: A dynamic financial simulation of research and development in technologically based business. R&D Management 1975;5:209-18.
10. Bierman H, Smidt S. The capital budgeting decision: economic analysis of investment projects, 8th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1993.
11. Wolff MF. Meet your competition: data from the IRI R&D survey. Research Technology Management 1994;37:18-24.