Klamath basin fishes: Argument is no substitute for evidence

Fisheries

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 20-25

  Lewis Jr , William M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PISCES;

EID: 0037356608     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Cooperman M. and Markle. D. F. 2003. The Endangered Species Act and the National Research Council's interim judgment in Klamath Basin. Fisheries 28(3):10-19.
2. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Interim Report from the Committee on Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin: scientific evaluation of Biological Opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River Basin. February 2002. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
3. Simon, D. C. 2002. Preliminary data analysis: annual survey of abundance and distribution of age 0 shortnose and Lost River suckers in Upper Klamath Lake. Annual report: 2002. Oregon Cooperative Research Unit. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Corvallis.
4. Simon, D. C., and D. F. Markle. 2001. Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake shortnose and Lost River suckers. Annual survey of abundance and distribution of age 0 shortnose and Lost River suckers in Upper Klamath Lake. Annual report: 2000. Oregon Cooperative Research Unit. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Corvallis.
5. USBOR (U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). 2001. Biological Assessment of the Klamath Project's continuing operations on southern Oregon/northern California ESU coho salmon and critical habitat for southern Oregon/northern California ESU coho salmon. Mid-Pacific Region. Klamath Basin Area Office, OR.
6. _. 2002. Final Biological Assessment: the effects of proposed actions related to Klamath Project operation (April 1, 2002-March 31, 2012) on federally-listed threatened and endangered species. Mid-Pacific Region. Klamath Basin Area Office, OR.
7. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2001. Biological/Conference Opinion regarding the effects of operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River/shortnose suckers. Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office, Klamath Falls, OR.
8. _. 2002. Biological/Conference Opinion regarding the effects of operation of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's proposed 10-year operation plan for the Klamath Project and its effect on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River and shortnose suckers. Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office. Klamath Falls, OR.
9. Welch, E.B., and T. Burke. 2001. Interim summary report: relationship between lake elevation and water quality in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Prepared by R2 Resource Consultants, Inc., Redmond, WA, for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Portland, OR. 23 March 2001.