Stepwise advancement using fixed functional appliances: Experimental perspective

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 41-46

  Rabie, A Bakr M ^a   Chayanupatkul, Atinooch ^a   Hägg, Urban ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAW MOVEMENT; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OSSIFICATION; PERIODIC ACID SCHIFF STAIN; PROGNATHIA; RAT; RAT STRAIN; REVIEW; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037355796     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/sodo.2003.34023     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance-Its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
2. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: A prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:375-388.
3. Chayanupatkul A, Bendeus M, Rabie ABM. Temporal pattern of bone formation during forward mandibular positioning in the rat. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:602 (abstr).
4. Rabie ABM, Zhao Z, Shen G, et al. Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibular advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:390-400.
5. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, et al. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11:17-30.
6. Du X, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Effects of Headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement VS conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:167-174.
7. Petrovic AG, Stutzmann JJ, Gasson N. The Final Length of the Mandible: Is it Genetically Predetermined? In: Carlson DS, ed. Craniofacial biology. Monograph 10, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1981;105-126.
8. Forwood MR, Turner CH. Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. Bone 1995;17:197S-205S (suppl).
9. Leung FYC, Rabie ABM, Hägg U. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the condyle during mandibular forward positioning. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:620 (abstr).
10. Tsai M, Rabie ABM, Hägg U. Replication of mesenchymal cells in the condyles during mandibular forward positioning. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:639 (abstr).
11. Shum L, Rabie ABM, Hägg U. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the glenoid fossa during mandibular protrusion. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:635 (abstr).
12. Wong L, Rabie ABM, Hägg U. Replicating mesenchymal cells in the glenoid fossa. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:468 (abstr).
13. Frost HM. A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clin Orthop 1983;175:286-292.
14. Lin JJ. Prevalence of malocclusion in Chinese children age 9-15. Clinical Dentistry 1985;5:57-65.
15. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:397-402.
16. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:181-198.
17. Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Lopez-Alonso A, et al. Pericytes as a supplementary source of osteoblasts in periosteal osteogenesis. Clin Orthop 1992;275:280-286.
18. Triffitt JT, Li G, Simpson AH, et al. Assessment of cell proliferation in regenerating bone during distraction osteogenesis at different distraction rates. J Orthop Res 1987;15:765-772.