Applying the new appraisal approach to transport policy at the local level in the UK

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-12

  Walton, William ^a   Shaw, Jon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aberdeen; Integrated transport; Local Transport Plan Local Transport Strategy; NATA NAM; Pragmatic multimodalism

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATED APPROACH; LOCAL PLANNING; ROAD CONSTRUCTION; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037353507     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00051-0     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aberdeen City Council, 2000. Local Transport Strategy for Aberdeen. ACC, Aberdeen.
2. Aberdeen City Council, 2001a. Air Quality Management Area Designation. ACC, Aberdeen.
3. Aberdeen City Council, 2001b. Bridge of Don Meeting 18 January 2001. Recording of public meeting.
4. Banister, D., 1999. Comment. Town Planning Review 70 (2), 148-150.
5. Banister, D., Berechman, Y., 2001. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography 9 (3), 209-218.
6. BBC (2001) Today. Broadcast 29th May. www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listen/ (accessed 29 June, 2001).
7. Bickersta., K., Walker, G., 2001. Participatory local government and transport planning. Environment and Planning A 33 (4), 431-451.
8. British Roads Federation, 1996. Britain's bypass progress. BRF, London.
9. Commission for Integrated Transport, 1999. National road traffic targets: Advice by the Commission for Integrated Transport. CfIT, London.
10. Commission for Integrated Transport, 2000. The CfIT Report: Public Attitudes to transport in England. CfIT, London.
11. Council for the Protection of Rural England, 1998. New Roads by New Means. CPRE, London.
12. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1997. New roads a last resort-Strang, Press Release No. 216. London.
13. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998a. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. DETR, London.
14. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998b. A New Deal for Trunk-roads in England. DETR, London.
15. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998c. Guidance on the new approach to appraisal. DETR, London.
16. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1999. £2.4 billion jackpot for local transport, Press Notice 1219. DETR, London.
17. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000a. Transport 2010: The 10 Year Plan. DETR, London.
18. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000b. Prescott-Every region a winner in £8.4bn local transport boost, Press Release 775. DETR, London.
19. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000c. Guidance on full local transport plans. DETR, London.
20. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000d. Guidance on the Methodology for Multi-Modal Studies. Volumes 1 and 2. DETR, London.
21. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2001. Prescott delivers strategy for modern and sustainable transport system. News Release 191. DETR, London.
22. Department of Transport , 1989. Roads for Prosperity. Cmnd 693. HMSO, London.
23. Department of Transport, 1995. Transport Report 1995-The Government's Expenditure Plans 1995-96 to 1997/98. HMSO, London.
24. Department of Transport, 1996. Transport: The Way Forward. HMSO, London.
25. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, 2001. Spellar announces £1.5 billion boost to local transport. Press Release 533, 13 December.
26. Financial Times, 2000. Prescott gives go-ahead for 39 new road schemes, 15 December, 3.
27. Financial Times, 2001. Commercial concerns on a popular route, 18 April, 15.
28. Forster, A., 2000. What do local authority politicians think about transport policy? The Centre for Transport Policy, Aberdeen.
29. Glaister, S., 2001. UK transport policy 1997-2001. www.cts.cv.ic.ac.uk/ (Accessed 7 February 2002).
30. Goodwin, P., Hallet, S., Kenny, P., Stokes, G., 1991. Transport: The New Realism. Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford.
31. Grampian Enterprise limited, 1998. Industrial Land Review. GEL, Aberdeen.
32. Halcrow Fox, 2000. Modern Transport System. www.nesedp.com/modern ansportstem/halcrow∀xer/ (accessed 1 December 2000).
33. Hanley, M., Spash, C., 1993. Cost Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
34. Hansard, 1998. vol. 317, 31 July, Cols 653-676.
35. Henneberry, J., Lawless, P., Townroe, P., 1998. Non-user benefits from investment in urban light rail: Evidence from Sheffield. In: Banister, D. (Ed.), Transport Policy and the Environment. E&FN Spon, London.
36. HM Government, 1987. Government expenditure plans, 1987-88 to 1989-90. Cmnd 56-II. HMSO, London.
37. HM Government, 1989. Government expenditure plans, 1989-90 to 1991-92. Cmnd 608. HMSO, London.
38. HM Government, 1991. Government expenditure plans, 1991-92 to 1993-94. Cmnd 1507. HMSO, London.
39. HM Government, 1992. Government expenditure plans, 1992-93 to 1994-95. Cmnd 1907. HMSO, London.
40. HM Government, 1996. Government expenditure plans, 1996-97 to 1998-99. Cmnd 3206. HMSO, London.
41. HM Government, 1997. Government expenditure plans, 1997-98 to 1999-2000. HMSO, London.
42. House of Commons, 1990. Roads for the future. First Report of the Transport Committee. Session 1989/90. HC 198-I. HMSO, London.
43. House of Commons, 1999a. Integrated Transport White Paper. Ninth Report of the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee. Session 1998-99. HC 32-I. The Stationery Office, London.
44. House of Commons, 1999b. Government response to the ninth report Of the Committee: Integrated transport white paper. Third special report. Session 1998-99. HC 708. The Stationery Office, London.
45. House of Commons, 2002. 10 year plan for transport. Eighth report of the Transport, Local Government and the Regions Committee. Session 2001-2002, HC 558-I, 22 March. The Stationery Office, London.
46. Institution of Civil Engineers, 2001. 2001 Local Transport Survey. ICE, London.
47. Labour Party, 1996. Consensus for change: Labour's transport strategy for the 21st Century. The Labour Party, London.
48. Labour Party, 1997. New Labour: Because Britain deserves better. The Labour Party, London.
49. Mackie, P., Preston, J., 1998. Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transport Policy 5, 1-7.
50. Marvin, S., Guy, S., 1999. Towards a new logic of transport planning? Town Planning Review 70 (2), 139-148.
51. Nellthorp, J., Mackie, P., 2000. The UK Roads Review-a hedonic model of decision making.. Transport Policy 7 (2), 127-138.
52. Oscar Faber/ERM, 1998. Sustainable Transport Study for Aberdeen. Scottish Office Central Research Unit, Edinburgh.
53. OXERA, 2000. The wider impacts of rail and road investment. The Railways Forum, London.
54. Pemberton, S., 2000. Institutional governance, scale and transport policy-lessons from Tyne and Wear. Journal of Transport Geography 8 (4), 295-308.
55. Press and Journal, 2000. Executive will not pay for Aberdeen bypass, 1 December, 3.
56. Press and Journal, 2001a. Modernisation of transport supported, 11 May, 6.
57. Press and Journal, 2001b. Wrath of commuters lands council in jam. 19 January, 1.
58. Roy, R., 2001. A plan for growth? An analysis of the 10 Year Plan's perspective for rail. Railway Forum, London.
59. Scottish Executive, 2001. Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance: A draft consultation document. Executive Summary. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
60. Scottish Executive, 2002. Scotland's transport: Delivering improvements. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
61. Shaw, J., Walton, W., 2001. Labour's new trunk-roads policy for England: An emerging pragmatic multimodalism? Environment and Planning A 33 (6), 1031-1056.
62. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, 1994. Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic. HMSO, London.
63. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, 1999. Transport and the economy. http://www.roads.dft.gov.uk/roadnetwork/sactra/report99/index.htm (accessed 12 July 2002).
64. Strategic Rail Authority, 2001. National rail trends 2001-02: 2. SRA, London.
65. Strategic Rail Authority, 2002. The strategic plan. SRA, London.
66. Transport 2000, 1998. Memorandum of Transport 2000. Written evidence presented to House of Commons Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmenvtra/ 32/8121621.htm (accessed 19 September, 2000).
67. Transport Geography Research Group and Universities Transport Studies Group, 2001. Prospects for transport in the new parliament. Conference held at the Royal Geographical Society, London, 20 September.
68. Vigar, G., 2000. Local 'Barriers' to Environmentally Sustainable Transport Planning. Local Environment 5 (1), 19-32.
69. Vigar, G., Healy, P., Hull, A., Davoudi, S., 2000. Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: An Institutional Analysis. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.
70. Walton, W., Farrington, J., 2000. The Sustainable Transport Study for Aberdeen: A pioneering attempt at a 'multimodal' study. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18 (5), 609- 627.
71. Welsh Office, 1998. Transporting Wales into the future. www.wales.org.uk/ subitransport/content/policy/transfuture/futurentents htm (accessed 1 October 2001).
72. Willis, K., Garrod, G., Harvey, D., 1998. A review of cost-benefit analysis as applied to the evaluation of new road proposals in the UK. Transportation Research D 3 (3), 141-156.