Overvoting and representation: An examination of overvoted presidential ballots in Broward and Miami-Dade counties

Electoral Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-47

  Herron, M C ^a   Sekhon, J S ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; PARTY POLITICS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

FLORIDA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037353496     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00052-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Achen, C.H., Shively, W.P., 1995. Cross-level Inference. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Bullock III, C.S., Dunn, R.E., 1996. Election roll-off a test of three explanations. Urban Affairs Review 32 (1), 71-86.
3. Darcy, R., Schneider, A., 1989. Confusing ballots, roll-off and the black vote. The Western Political Quarterly 42, 347-364.
4. Hirschman, A.O., 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
5. Knack, S., Kropf, M., 2001. Invalidated ballots in the 1996 presidential election: A county-level analysis. Working paper, University of Missouri at Kansas City.
6. Longley, L.D., Peirce, N.R., 1999. The Electoral College Primer 2000. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. Miller, W.E., Shanks, J.M., 1996. The New American Voter. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
8. Moreno, D., Warren, C., 1992. The conservative enclave: Cubans in Florida. In: O'de la Garzas, R., DeSipio, L. (Eds.), Latinos in the 1988 Election. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
9. Moreno, D., Warren, C., 1992-1993. The Cuban community and the 1992 presidential election. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Politics 6, 27-36.
10. Nichols, S.M., Strizek, G.A., 1995. Electronic voting machines and ballot roll-off. American Politics Quarterly 23 (3), 300-318.
11. Radcliff, B., 1994. Turnout and the democratic vote. American Politics Quarterly 22 (3), 259-276.
12. Shocket, P.A., Heighberger, N.R., Brown, C., 1992. The effect of voting technology on voting behavior in a simulation multi-candidate city council election: A political experiment of ballot transparency. The Western Political Quarterly 45 (2), 521-537.
13. Sinclair, R.C., Mark, M.M., Moore, S.E., Lavis, C.A., Soldat, A.S., 2000. An electoral butterfly effect. Nature 408, 665-666.
14. The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, 2001. Residual votes attributable to technology: An assessment of the reliability of existing voting equipment. Working draft available from http://www.vote.caltech.edu/
15. Tomz, M., Van Houweling, R., 2001. How does voting equipment affect the racial gap in voided ballots? Working paper, Stanford University.
16. US House Committee on Government Reform, 2001. Income and racial disparities in the undercount in the 2000 presidential election. Report prepared by the Special Investigations Division.
17. Walker, J.L., 1966. Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of the office block and party column ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science 10 (4), 448-463.
18. Wand, J.N., Shotts, K.W., Sekhon, J.S., Mebane, W.R. Jr, Herron, M.C., Brady, H.E., 2001. The butterfly did it: The aberrant vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida. Forthcoming. American Political Science Review 95 (4), 793-810.
19. White, H., 1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50 (1), 1-26.