메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-114

Clinical authorization: What is best for the patient?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; LABORATORY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATHOLOGIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARD;

EID: 0037349895     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/000456303763046012     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (6)

References (3)
  • 1
    • 0003341563 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The duties of a doctor registered to practice chemical pathology
    • London: Royal College of Pathologists
    • Royal College of Pathologists. The duties of a doctor registered to practice chemical pathology. In: Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines on Good Medicial Practice in Pathology. London: Royal College of Pathologists, 2001: 3-8
    • (2001) Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines on Good Medicial Practice in Pathology , pp. 3-8
  • 2
    • 0037348263 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A survey of laboratory practice in the clinical authorization and reporting of results
    • Prinsloo PJJ, Gray TA. A survey of laboratory practice in the clinical authorization and reporting of results. Ann Clin Biochem 2002; 40: 149-155
    • (2002) Ann Clin Biochem , vol.40 , pp. 149-155
    • Prinsloo, P.J.J.1    Gray, T.A.2
  • 3
    • 0003190867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standing Advisory Committee in Chemical Pathology: Guidelines for the provision of interpretative comments on biochemical reports
    • Standing Advisory Committee in Chemical Pathology: Guidelines for the provision of interpretative comments on biochemical reports. Bull Roy Coll Pathol 1998; 104: 25
    • (1998) Bull Roy Coll Pathol , vol.104 , pp. 25


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.