Application of a responsive evaluation approach in medical education

Medical Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 256-266

  Curran, Vernon ^a,b   Christopher, Jeanette ^a   Lemire, Francine ^a   Collins, Alice ^a   Barrett, Brendan ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical competence; Education, medical continuing *standards; Newfoundland; Programme evaluation

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVALUATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; NEWFOUNDLAND; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 0037348121     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01442.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Davis DA, Haynes RB, Chambers L, Neufield VR, McKibbon A, Tugwell P. The impact of CME: a methodological review of the continuing medical education literature. Evaluation Health Professions 1984;7 (3):251-83.
2. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomised controlled trials. JAMA 1992;268 (9):111-7.
3. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274 (9):700-7.
4. Cuba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage; 1989.
5. Worthen BR, Sanders JR. Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman; 1987.
6. Stake RE. To evaluate an arts program. In: Stake RE. Evaluating the Arts in Education. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E Merrill Publishing; 1975.
7. Stake RE. Program evaluation: particularly program evaluation. In: Madaus GF, Scriven MS, Stufflebeam DL, eds. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing; 1983.
8. Page GG, Bates J, Dyer SM, Vincent DR, Bordage G, Jacques A. Physician assessment and physician enhancement programs in Canada. Int J Risk Safety Medicine 1996;8:217-24.
9. Rothman A, Cohen R, Ross J. Evaluating the clinical skills of foreign medical school graduates participating in an internship preparation program. Acad Med 1990;65 (6):391-5.
10. Whelan G. High-stakes medical performance testing: the clinical skills assessment program. JAMA 2000;283 (13):1748.
11. Norman G, Davis D, Lamb S, Hanna E, Caulford P, Kaigas T. Competency assessment of primary care physicians as part of a peer review program. JAMA 1993;270 (9):1046-51.
12. Rosier F, Baling J, Stein R. Remedial medical education. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:274-9.
13. Cunnington J, Hanna E, Turnbull J, Kaigas T, Norman G. Defensible assessment of the competency of the practising physician. Acad Med 1997;72 (1):9-13.
14. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The Programme Evaluation Standards. 2nd edn. London: Sage; 1994.
15. Le Compte MD, Preissle J. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. Toronto: Academic Press; 1993.
16. Stufflebeam DL. Toward a Technology for Evaluating Evaluations. Rockville, MD: Educational Resources Information Center; 1979.
17. Stufflebeam DL. Meta-evaluation: an overview. Evaluation Health Professions 1978;1 (1):17-43.
18. Stufflebeam DL. Meta-evaluation: concepts, standards, and uses. In: Berk R, ed. Educational Evaluation Methodology: The State of the Art. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1981.
19. Hurteau M, Nadeau M. The pros and cons of responsive evaluation. Rockville, MD: Educational Resources Information Center; 1985.
20. Klintberg IG. A responsive evaluation of two programmes in medical education. Studies Educational Evaluation 1976;2 (1):23-30.
21. Stake RE. Responsive evaluation. In: Husen T, Postlewaite TN, eds. International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies. New York: Pergamon Press; 1983.