Double-sphere model in the enclosed cavity perturbation technique

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 2736-2745

  Inoue, Ryotaro ^a   Kitano, Haruhisa ^a   Maeda, Atsutaka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCIES; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; MICROWAVES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

MICROWAVE CAVITY;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY;

EID: 0037348073     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1538314     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. For review of this technique, see O. Klein, S. Donovan, M. Dressel, and G. Grüner, Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 14, 2423 (1993).
2. The formula for the skin-depth regime is the direct result of the definition of the surface impedance. See, for example, L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Electrodynamics of Cuntinuous Media (Pergamon, Oxford, 1984).
3. The Hagen-Rubens relation cannot be applied when the nonlocal response of the material is significant. Such is the case for superconductivity or the anomalous skin effect.
4. J. Muller, Z. Hochfrequenztech. Elektroak. 54, 157 (1939).
5. H. A. Bethe and J. Schwinger, N.D.R.C. Report DI-117, 1943.
6. R. A. Waldron, Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 107C, 272 (1960).
7. L. I. Buravov and I. F. Shchegolev, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 14, 528 (1971).
8. K. S. Champlin and R. R. Krongard, IRE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MIT-9, 545 (1961).
9. B. E. Brodwin and M. K. Parsons, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 494 (1965).
10. D. N. Peligrad, B. Nebendahl, C. Kessler, M. Mehring, A. Dulčić, M. Požek, and D. Paar, Phys. Rev. B 58, 11652 (1998).
11. H. B. Cassimir, Philips Res. Rep. 2, 42 (1947).
12. R. Inoue (unpublished).
13. J. E. Tompkin and E. G. Spencer, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 969 (1957).
14. L. C. Maier and J. C. Slater, J. Appl. Phys. 23, 68 (1952). The same results can be obtained in most models cited here.