Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 119-122

  Guillinta, Paulo ^a   Vasani, Sunil N ^a   Granet, David B ^a   Kikkawa, Don O ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENUCLEATION; EVISCERATION; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; GRANULOMA; HUMAN; INFRARED RADIATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OCULOGRAPHY; ORBIT IMPLANT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT INDICATION; VISUAL PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; EYE ENUCLEATION; EYE EVISCERATION; EYE MOVEMENTS; EYE, ARTIFICIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ORBIT; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;

EID: 0037347301     PISSN: 07409303     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000056022.07896.06     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Perry AC. Advances in enucleation. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;8:75-81.
2. Cepela M, Teske S. Orbital implants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1996;7:38-42.
3. Goldberg RA. Who should have hydroxyapatite orbital implants? [editorial] Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:566-7.
4. Edelstein C, Shields CL, De Potter P, et al. Complications of motility peg placement for the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1616-21.
5. Pacheco EM, Civelek C, Natarajan TK, et al. Clinicopathological correlation of technetium bone scan in vascularization of hydroxyapatite implants. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1173-7.
6. Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthlamic socket implant. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1688-95.
7. Cowper TR. Hydroxyapatite motility implants in ocular prosthetics. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1995:73:267-73.
8. Jordan DR, Chan S, Mawn L, et al. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmology 1999;106:505-12.
9. Lin CJ, Liao SL, Jou JR, et al. Complications of the motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite implants. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:394-6.
10. Knox PC, Weir CR, Murphy PJ. Modification of visually guided saccades by a nonvisual afferent feedback signal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2561-5.
11. Kumra S, Sporn A, Hommer DW, et al. Smooth pursuit eyetracking impairment in childhood-onset psychotic disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1291-8.
12. Tran DB, Silverman SE, Zimmerman K, et al. Age-related deterioration of motion perception and detection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:269-73.
13. Weir CR, Knox PC. Modification of smooth pursuit initiation by a nonvisual, afferent feedback signal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:2297-302.
14. Rubin PA, Fay AM, Remulla HD. Primary placement of a motility coupling post in porous polyethylene orbital implants. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:826-31.