Latent mixed Markov modelling of smoking transitions using Monte Carlo bootstrapping

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 125-146

  Mannan, Haider R ^a   Koval, John J ^b  

^a CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH INFORMATION   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; SMOKING; SMOKING HABIT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHILD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ONTARIO; SMOKING;

EID: 0037346941     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0962280203sm323ra     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gillies PA. Accuracy in the measurement of the prevalence of smoking in young people. Health Education Journal 1985; 44: 36-8.
2. Gillies PA, Wilcox B, Coates C, Kristmundsdottir F, Reid DT. Use of objective measurement in the validation of self-reported smoking in children aged 10 and 11 years: Saliva thiocyanate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1982; 36: 205-8.
3. McKennell AC. Bias in the reported incidence of smoking by children. International Journal of Epidemiology 1980; 9: 167-77.
4. Stacy AW, Flay BR, Sussman S, Brown KS, Santi S, Best JA. Validity of alternative self-report indices of smoking among adolescents: Psychological Assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990; 2: 442-6.
5. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. A latent class model of smoking experimentation in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1989; 30: 761-73.
6. Luepker RV, Pechaeck TF, Murray DM, Johnson CA, Hurd PP, Jacobs PR. Saliva thiocyanate: A chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. American Journal of Public Health 1981; 71: 1320-24.
7. McNeil AD, Jarvis MT, West R, Russell MAH, Bryant A. Saliva cotinine as an indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. British Journal of Addiction 1987; 82: 1355-60.
8. Murray DM, Perry CL. The measurement of substance use among adolescents: When is the "bogus pipeline method" needed? Addictive Behaviours 1987; 12: 225-33.
9. Heise DR. Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review 1969; 34: 93-101.
10. Joreskog KG. Estimating and testing simplex models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1970; 23: 121-45.
11. Henry NW. Measurement models for continuous and discrete variables. In Goldberger AS, Duncan OS, eds. Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar, 1973.
12. Pederson LL, Lefcoe NM. Change in smoking status among a cohort of late adolescents: Prediction and explanation of initiation, maintenance and cessation. International Journal of Epidemiology 1986; 15: 519-26.
13. Blumen I, Kogan M, McCarthy PJ. The Industrial Mobility of Labor as a Probability Process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 1955.
14. Wiggins LM. Panel Analysis, Latent Probability Models for Attitude and Behaviour Processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1973.
15. Goodman LA. Statistical methods for analyzing processes of change. American Journal of Sociology 1962; 68: 57-58.
16. Lazarsfeld PF. Some episodes in the history of panel analysis. In Kandel DB, ed. Longitudinal Research on Drug Use. Washington D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1978, pp. 249-65.
17. Taylor MC. The black-and-white model of attitude stability: A latent class examination of opinion and nonopinion in the American public. American Journal of Sociology 1983; 89(2): 373-401.
18. Morgan TM, Aneshensel CS, Clark VA. Parameter estimation for mover-stayer models: Analyzing depression over time. Sociological Methods and Research 1983; 11(3), 345-66.
19. Rindskopf R, Rindskopf W. The value of latent class analysis in medical diagnosis. Statistics in Medicine 1986; 6: 21-7.
20. Uebersax JS. Grove WM. Latent class analysis of diagnostic agreement. Statistics in Medicine, 1990; 9: 559-72.
21. Uebersax JS. Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88: 421-27.
22. Van De Pol F, Langeheine R. Mixed Markov models, mover-stayer models, and the EM algorithm, with an application to labour market data from the Netherlands Socioeconomic panel. In Loppi R, Bolasco S, eds. Multiway Data Analysis, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989, pp. 485-95.
23. Auranen K, Arjas E, Leino T, Takala AK. Transmission of pneumococcal carriage in families: A latent Markov process model for binary longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95 (452): 1044-53.
24. Cook RJ, Ng ETM, Meade MO. Estimation of operating characteristics for dependent diagnostic tests based on latent Markov models. Biometrics 2000; 56: 1109-17.
25. Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW. Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1968.
26. Langeheine R, Van De Pol F. A unifying framework for Markov modelling in discrete space and discrete time. Sociological Methods and Research 1990; 18: 416-41.
27. Van De Pol F, De Leeuw J. A latent Markov model to correct for measurement error. Sociological Methods and Research 1986; 15: 118-41.
28. Van De Pol F, Langeheine R. Mixed Markov Latent Class models. In Clogg CC, ed. Sociological Methodology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, pp. 213-47.
29. Poulsen CS. Latent structure analysis with choice modelling applications. Ph.D. dissertation, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1982.
30. Converse PE. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter DE, ed. Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, 1964.
31. Edwards AWF. Likelihood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
32. Dempster AP, Laired NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 1977; 39: 1-22.
33. Pol F Van de, Langeheine R, Jong W De. Penmark 3: User's Manual. Panel Analysis Using Markov Chains: A Latent Class Analysis Program, 2000.
34. Langeheine R, Pannekoek J, Pol F Van de. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Research & Methods 1996; 24(4): 492-516.
35. Akaike H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52: 317-32.
36. Aitkin M, Anderson J, Hinde J. Statistical modeling of data on teaching styles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1981; 144: 419-61.
37. Collins LM, Fidler PL, Wugalter SE, Long JD (1993). Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1993; 28: 375-89.
38. Pol F Van de. Personal communication, 1991.
39. Pol F Van de, Mannan HR. Questions of a novice in latent markov modelling. Methods of Psychological Research 7(2): 1-18.
40. Driezen P. The development of youth smoking: Clusters of initiation and regular smoking trajectories. M.Sc dissertation, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 2001.
41. Pederson LL, Koval JJ, McGrady GA, Tyas SL The degree and type of relationship between psychosocial variables and smoking status for students in grade 8: Is there a dose-response relationship? Preventive Medicine 1998; 27: 337-47.
42. Newcomb MD, Bentler PM. Consequences of Adolescent Drug Use: Impact on the Lives of Young Adults. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1988.