Preimplantation diagnosis

Clinics in Perinatology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 67-80

  Nelson, Lawrence J ^a  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; CONCEPTION; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; EMBRYO; ETHICS; FETUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; ONSET AGE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFIT; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

EID: 0037346767     PISSN: 00955108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0095-5108(02)00084-2     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Practice Committee Report of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Available at: www. asrm.org Accessed June 20, 2002.
2. National Society of Genetic Counselors. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Available at www. nsgc.org/pr_diagnosis_10_01.asp. Accessed June 19, 2002.
3. Botkin JR. Ethical issues and practical problems in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J Law Med Ethics 1998;26:17-28.
4. Nelson LJ, Clark HW, Goldman RL, et al. Taking the train to a world of strangers: health care marketing and ethics. Hast Cent Rep 1989;19:36-43.
5. Cohen CB. Leaps and boundaries: expanding oversight of human stem cell research. In: Holland S, Lebacqz K, Zoloth L, editors. The human embryonic stem cell debate. MIT Press; 2001. p. 211-22.
6. Nelson LJ, Marshall MF. Ethical and legal analyses of three coercive policies aimed at substance abuse by pregnant women. Report to the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, award #030790, 1998. p. 39-46.
7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey; 505 US 833 (1992).
8. Meyer MJ, Nelson LJ. Respecting what we destroy: reflections on human embryo research. Hastings Cent Rep 2001;31:16-23.
9. Findlay I, Ray P, Quirke P, et al. Allelic drop-out and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Human Repro 1995;10:1609-18.
10. Saxton M. Why members of the disability community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion. In: Parens E, Asch A, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown University Press; 2000. p. 147-64.
11. Steinbock B. Disability, prenatal testing, and selective abortion. In: Parens E, Asch A, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown University Press; 2000. p. 108-23.
12. Baily MA. Why I had amniocentesis. In: Parens E, Asch A, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown University Press; 2000. p. 64-71.
13. Steinbock B. Sex selection: not obviously wrong. Hast Cent Rep 2002;32:23-8.
14. Ethics committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 1999;72:595-8.
15. Ethics committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001;75:861-4.
16. Overall C. Ethics and human reproduction. Allen and Unwin; 1987. p. 27.
17. Wachbroit R, Wasserman D. Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counseling. Stan Law Pol Rev 1995;6:103-10.
18. Callahan D. Medical futility, medical necessity: the-problem-without-a-name. Hast Cent Rep 1991;21:30-5.
19. Nelson LJ. Medical futility and the clinician's conscience. In: Misbin R, Jennings B, Orentlicher D, et al, editors. Health care crisis? The search for answers. University Publishing Group; 1995. p. 60-70.
20. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, Frederick MD. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press; 1994. p. 475-83.
21. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for early-onset alzheimer disease caused by V717L mutation. JAMA 2002;287:1018-21.