Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume

New Forests

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-108

  Aphalo, Pedro ^a,b,c   Rikala, Risto ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Containers; Nursery; Outplanting; Performance; Seedling quality; Silver birch

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CORRELATION METHODS; MORPHOLOGY; PLANT CELL CULTURE;

STURDINESS INDEX;

SEED;

FORESTRY; SEEDLING; SPACING; TREE PLANTING;

EID: 0037346474     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022618810937     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aphalo P.J. and Ballaré C.L. 1995. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions. Functional Ecology. 9: 5-14.
2. Aphalo P.J., Ballaré C.L. and Scopel A.L. 1999. Plant-plant signalling, the shade avoidance response and competition. Journal of Experimental Botany 50: 1629-1634.
3. Aphalo P.J. and Lehto T. 1997. Effects of light quality on growth and N accumulation in birch seedlings. Tree Physiology 17: 125-132.
4. Aphalo P.J. and Lehto T. 2001. Effect of lateral far-red light supplementation on the growth and morphology of birch seedlings and its interaction with mineral nutrition. Trees 15: 297-303.
5. Cajander A.K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica 56.
6. Carlson L.W. and Endean F. 1976. The effect of rooting volume and container configuration on the early growth of white spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 6: 221-224.
7. Endean F. and Carlson L.W. 1975. The effect of rooting volume on the early growth of lodgepole pine seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 5: 55-60.
8. Halonen O., Tulkki H. and Derome J. 1983. Nutrient analysis methods. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 121.
9. Ihaka R. and Gentleman R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5: 299-314.
10. Kinghorn J.M. 1974. Principles and concepts in container planting. In: Tinus R.W., Stein W.I. and Balmer W.E. (eds), Proceedings of the North American Containerized Forest Tree Seedling Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council, Denver, Colorado, pp. 8-18.
11. Landis T.D., Tinus R.W., McDonald S.E. and Barnett J.P. 1990. Containers and Growing Media, Vol. 2 of The Container Tree Nursery Manual. USDA Forest Service, Washington DC.
12. McGowan M. and Devereux C. 1990. Does restricted root space influence plant growth? In: Davies W.J. and Jeffcoat B. (eds), Importance of Root to Shoot Communication in the Responses to Environmental Stress. British Society for Plant Growth Regulation, Bristol, pp. 301-302.
13. Mexal J.G. and Landis T.D. 1990. Target Seedling Concepts: Height and Diameter Target Seedling Symposium: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of Western Forest Nursery Associations. August 13-17, 1990, No. RM-200 in USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Roseburg, Oregon, pp. 17-35.
14. Pinheiro J.C. and Bates D.M. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York.
15. Rikala R. 1989. Planting performance of size graded Scots pine seedlings. Forestry Supplement 62: 29-37.
16. Rikala R. 2000. Production and quality requirements of forest tree seedlings in Finland. Tree Planters' Notes 49: 56-60.
17. Simpson D.G. 1991. Growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of interior spruce seedlings. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 8: 160-165.
18. Simpson D.G. 1995. Nursery growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of Douglas-fir and Lodgepole pine seedlings. In: National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations. No. RM-GTR-257 in USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 105-115.
19. Sweet G.B. and Wareing P.F. 1966. The relative growth rates of large and small seedlings in forest tree species. In: Physiology in Forestry. Soc. Forest. Great Brit., 6th discussion meeting., pp. 110-119.
20. Switzer G.L. and Nelson L.E. 1963. Effects of nursery fertility and density on seedling characteristics, yield, and field performance of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 27: 461-464.
21. Tanaka Y. and Timmis R. 1974. Effects of container density on growth and cold hardiness of Douglas-fir seedlings. In: Tinus R.W., Stein W.I. and Balmer W.E. (eds), Proceedings of the North American Containerized Forest Tree Seedling Symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council, Denver, Colorado, pp. 181-186.
22. Timmis R. and Tanaka Y. 1976. Effects of container density and plant water stress on growth and cold hardiness of Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Science 22: 167-172.
23. Tschaplinski T.J. and Blake T.J. 1985. Effects of root restriction on growth correlations, water relations and senescence of alder [Alnus glutinosa] seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 64: 167-176.
24. Van den Driessche R. 1984. Relationship between spacing and nitrogen fertilization of seedlings in the nursery, seedling mineral nutrition, and outplanting performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14: 431-436.
25. Will R.E. and Teskey R.O. 1997. Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and root restriction on net photosynthesis, water relations and foliar carbohydrate status of loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Physiology 17: 655-661.