Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P.W. Anderson

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 135-142

  Adler, Stephen L ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collapse; Decoherence; Measurement problem; Reduction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037346431     PISSN: 13552198     EISSN: 18792502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00086-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adler, S. L. (2002). Environmental influence on the measurement process in stochastic reduction models. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 35, 841-858.
2. Adler, S. L., Brody, D. C., Brun, T. A., & Hughston, L. P. (2001). Martingale models for quantum state reduction. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34, 8795-8820.
3. Albert, D. Z. (1992). Quantum mechanics and experience (pp. 88-92, 161-164). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Anderson, P. W. (2001). Science: A 'Dappled World' or a 'Seamless Web'?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32, 487-494; 'Reply to Cartwright', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32, 499-500.
5. Ax, J., & Kochen, S. (1999). Extension of quantum mechanics to individual systems. arXiv: Quant-ph/9905077.
6. Bacciagaluppi, G. (2001). Remarks on space-time and locality in Everett's interpretation. Talk delivered at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability, and Bell's Theorems. Cracow, 19-23 August 2001, proceedings to be published by Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht (NATO Science Series); preprint on Pittsburgh PhilSci Archive.
7. Barrett, J. A. (1999). The quantum mechanics of minds and worlds (pp. 227-232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bassi, A., & Ghirardi, G. C. (2000). A general argument against the universal validity of the superposition principle. Physics Letters A, 275, 373-381.
9. Bell, J. S. (1990). Against Measurement, In A.I. Miller (Ed.), Sixty-two years of uncertainty (proceedings of the Erice School, 5-14 August, 1989) (pp. 17-31) (reprinted in Physics World, August 1990, pp. 33-40). New York: PlenumPress.
10. Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of 'Hidden' variables I and II. Physical Review, 85, 166-193.
11. Brown, H. R. (1986). The insolubility proof of the quantum measurement problem. Foundations of Physics, 16, 857-870.
12. Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the quantum world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Secs. 5.4 and 8.1.
13. Butterfield, J. (2001). Some worlds of quantum theory. In R. Russell et al. (Eds.), CTNS/Vatican Observatory volume on Quantum Theory and Divine Action, to appear.
14. De Witt, B. S., & Graham, N. (1973). The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15. Diósi, L. (1988). Continuous quantum measurement and Itô formalism. Physics Letters A, 129, 419-423.
16. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghi, N. (1992). Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Physics, 67, 843-907.
17. Fine, A. (1969). On the general quantum theory of measurement. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 65, 111-122.
18. Fine, A. (1970). Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem. Physical Review D, 2, 2783-2787.
19. Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P., & Rimini, A. (1990). Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. Physical Review A, 42, 78-89.
20. Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470-491.
21. Gisin, N. (1984). Quantum measurements and stochastic processes. Physical Review Letters, 52, 1657-1660.
22. Grübl, G. (2002). The quantum measurement problem enhanced. arXiv: Quant-ph/0202101; also private email communication to the author.
23. Harris, R. A., & Stodolsky, L. (1981). On the time dependence of optical activity. Journal of Chemical Physics, 74, 2145-2155.
24. Joos, E. (1999). Elements of environmental decoherence. In P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, I.-O. Stamatescu (Eds.), Decoherence: Theoretical, experimental, and conceptual problems (pp. 1-17). New York: Springer.
25. Joos, E., & Zeh, H. D. (1985). The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. Zeitschrift für Physik B-Condensed Matter, 59, 223-243.
26. Kent, A., & McElwaine, J. (1997). Quantum prediction algorithms. Physical Review A, 55, 1703-1720.
27. Pearle, P. (1976). Reduction of the state vector by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Physical Review D, 13, 857-868.
28. Pearle, P. (1979). Toward explaining why events occur. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 18, 489-518.
29. Tegmark, M., & Wheeler, J. A. (2001). 100 Years of the quantum. Scientific American (February 2001), 284, 68-75.
30. Zurek, W. H. (1991). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today, 44(10), 36-44.