Use of power mobility for a young child with spinal muscular atrophy

Physical Therapy

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 253-262

  Jones, Maria A ^a   McEwen, Irene R ^a   Hansen, Laura ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Developmental skills; Power mobility; Young children

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT MOBILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY; WHEELCHAIR;

EID: 0037344199     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/83.3.253     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gesell A. The First Five Years of Life. 5th ed. London, United Kingdom: Metheun; 1966.
2. Tefft D, Guerette P, Furumasu J. Cognitive predictors of young children's readiness for powered mobility. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:665-670.
3. Verburg G, Field D, Jarvis S. Motor, perceptual, and cognitive factors that affect mobility control. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 10th Annual Conference. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1987:468-470.
4. Hays RM. Childhood motor impairments: clinical overview and scope of the problem. In: Jaffe KM, ed. Childhood Powered Mobility: Developmental, Technical, and Clinical Perspectives. Proceedings of the RESNA First Northwest Regional Conference. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1987: 1-10.
5. Campbell SK. Central nervous system dysfunction in children. In: Campbell SK, ed. Pediatric Neurologic Physical Therapy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1991:1-17.
6. Butler C. Wheelchair toddlers. In: Pediatric Powered Mobility: Developmental Perspectives, Technical Issues, Clinical Approaches. Arlington, Va: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1997:1-6.
7. McEwen IR. Children with cognitive impairments. In: Campbell SK, ed. Physical Therapy for Children. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2000:502-532.
8. Butler C. Augmentative mobility: why do it? Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1991;2:801-815.
9. Butler C. High tech tots: technology for mobility, manipulation, communication, and learning in early childhood. Infants Young Child. 1988;1(2):66-67.
10. Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28:325-332.
11. Butler C, Okamoto GA, McKay TM. Powered mobility for very young disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983;25:472-474.
12. Zazula JL, Foulds RA. Mobility device for a child with phocomelia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:137-139.
13. Paulsson K, Christoffersen M. Psychosocial aspects on technical aids: how does independent motility affect the psychosocial and intellectual development of children with physical disabilities? In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 1984:282-285.
14. Kermoian R, Campos JJ. Locomotor experience: a facilitator of spatial cognitive development. Child Dev. 1988;59:908-917.
15. Telzrow RW, Campos JJ, Shepherd A, et al. Spatial understanding in infants with motor handicaps. In: Jaffe KM, ed. Childhood Powered Mobility: Developmental, Technical, and Clinical Perspectives. Proceedings of the RESNA First Northwest Regional Conference. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1987:62-69.
16. Campos JJ, Bertenthal BI. Locomotion and psychological development in infancy. In: Jaffe KM, ed. Childhood Powered Mobility: Developmental, Technical, and Clinical Perspectives. Proceedings of the RESNA First Northwest Regional Conference. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1987: 11-42.
17. Bertenthal BI, Campos JJ, Barrett KC. Self-produced locomotion: an organizer of emotional, cognitive, and social development in infancy. In: Emde RN, Harmon RJ; eds. Continuities and Discontinuities in Development. New York, NY: Plenum; 1984.
18. Acredolo LP, Adams A, Goodwyn SW. The role of self-produced movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. J Exp Child Psychol. 1984;38:312-327.
19. Benson JB, Uzgiris IC. Effect of self-initiated locomotion on infant search activity. Dev Psychol. 1985;21:923-931.
20. Horobin R, Acredolo L. The role of attentiveness, mobility history, and separation of hiding sites on stage IV search behavior. J Exp Child Psychol. 1986;41:114-127.
21. Gustafson GE. Effects of the ability to locomote on infants' social and exploratory behaviors: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 1984; 20:397-405.
22. Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Dev. 1998;69:577-598.
23. Kangas K. Clinical assessment and training strategies for the child's mastery of independent powered mobility. In: Furumasu J, ed. Pediatric Powered Mobility: Developmental Perspectives, Technical Issues, and Clinical Approaches. Arlington, Va: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1997:33-47.
24. Behrmann MM. Assistive technology training. In: Flippo KF, Inge KJ, Barcus JM, eds. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work, and Community. Baltimore, Md: Brookes; 1995:211-222.
25. Cook AM, Hussey SM. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1995.
26. Galvin JC, Scherer, MJ. Evaluating, Selecting, and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology. Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen Publishers; 1996.
27. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, III: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988.
28. Dunn W. Integrated related services. In: Meyer LH, Peck CA, Brown L, eds. Critical Issues in the Lives of People With Severe Disabilities. Baltimore, Md: Brookes; 1991:353-377.
29. Evans IM. Testing and diagnosis: a review and evaluation. In: Meyer LH, Peck CA, Brown L, eds. Critical Issues in the Lives of People with Severe Disabilities. Baltimore, Md: Brookes; 1991:25-44.
30. McEwen IR, Shelden ML. Pediatric therapy in the 1990s: the demise of the educational versus medical dichotomy. Occupational and Physical Therapy in Educational Environments. 1995;15(2):33-45.
31. Reichle J, Sigafoos J. Establishing spontaneity and generalization. In: Reichle J, York J, Sigafoos J, eds. Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Strategies for Learners With Severe Disabilities. Baltimore, Md: Brookes; 1991:157-171.
32. Larin HM. Motor learning: theories and strategies for the practitioner. In: Campbell SK, ed. Physical Therapy for Children. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1994:157-181.
33. Mulligan M, Lacy L, Guess D. Effects of massed, distributed, or spaced trial sequencing on severely handicapped students' performance. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped. 1982;7(2): 48-61.
34. Newborg J, Stock J, Wnek L, et al. Battelle Developmental Inventory: Examiner's Manual. Allen, Tex: DLM/Teaching Resources; 1998.
35. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, et al. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual. Boston, Mass: New England Medical Center Publications; 1992.
36. Boyd RD, Welge P, Sexton D, Miller JH. Concurrent validity of the Battelle Developmental Inventory: Relationship with the Bayley Scales in young children with known or suspected disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention. 1989;13:14-23.
37. McLean M, McCormick K, Bruder MB, Burdg NB. An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Battelle Developmental Inventory with a population of children younger than 30 months with identified handicapping conditions. Journal of the Division of Early Childhood. 1987;11:238-246.
38. Snyder P, Lawson S, Thompson B, et al. Evaluating the psychometric integrity of instruments used in early intervention research: the Battelle Developmental Inventory. Topics in Early Child Special Education. 1993;13:216-232.
39. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Faas RM. A content validity study of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 1991;3:177-184.
40. Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther. 1990;70: 602-610.
41. Wright-Ott C. The transitional powered mobility aid: a new concept and tool for early mobility. In: Furumasu J, ed. Pediatric Powered Mobility: Developmental Perspectives, Technical Issues, Clinical Approaches. Arlington, Va: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 1997:58-69.
42. Breed AL, Ibler I. The motorized wheelchair: new freedom, new responsibility, and new problems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24: 366-371.
43. Hays RM, Jaffe KM, Ingman E. Accidental death associated with motorized wheelchair use: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:709-710.
44. Neely RA, Neely PA. The relationship between powered mobility and early learning in young children with physical disabilities. InfantToddler Intervention. 1993;3(2):85-91.