Level-repetition effects in hierarchical stimulus processing: Timing and location of cortical activity

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 255-269

  Schatz, Jeffrey ^a   Erlandson, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Hierarchical processing; Repetition priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; STIMULUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037344185     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00158-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Clark V.P., Hillyard S.A. Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 8:1996;387-402.
2. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., Hillyard S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15:2002;95-111.
3. Ferree T.C., Luu P., Russell G.S., Tucker D.M. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112:2001;536-544.
4. Fink G.R., Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J., Dolan R.J. Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain. 120:1997;1779-1791.
5. Gomez G.C.M., Clark V.P., Fan S., Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr. 7:1994;41-51.
6. Han S., Fan S., Chen L., Zhuo Y. On the different processing of wholes and parts: a psychophysiological study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 9:1997;686-697.
7. Han S., Fan S., Chen L., Zhuo Y. Modulation of brain activities by hierarchical processing: a high-density ERP study. Brain Topogr. 11:1999;171-183.
8. Han, S., He, X., Woods, D.L., 2000a. Hierarchical processing and level-repetition effect as indexed by early brain potentials. Psychophysiology 37, 817-830.
9. Han, S., Liu, W., Yund, E.W., Woods, D.L., 2000b. Spatially and hierarchically allocated attentions: an electrophysiological study. Neuroreport 11, 2753-2758.
10. Heinze H.J., Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Burchert W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 4:1998;485-498.
11. Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R., Burchert, W., et al., 1994a. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of spatial selective attention in humans. Nature 392, 543-546.
12. Heinze, H.J., Münte, T.F., Mangun, G.R., 1994b. The order of global and local-level information processing: electrophysiological evidence for parallel perceptual processes. In: Heinze, H., Münte, T., Mangun, G.R. (Eds.), Cognitive Electrophysiology. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp. 1-25.
13. Johnson M.H., deHaan M., Oliver A., et al. Recording and analyzing high-density event-related potentials with infants using the geodesic sensor net. Dev. Neuropsychol. 19:2001;295-323.
14. Kim N., Ivry R.B., Robertson L.C. Sequential priming in hierarchically organized figures: effects of target level and target resolution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25:1999;715-729.
15. Lamb M.R., London B., Pond H.M., Whitt K.A. Automatic and controlled processes in the analysis of hierarchical structure. Psychol. Sci. 9:1998;14-19.
16. Lamb M.R., Pond H.M., Zahir G. Contributions of automatic and controlled processes to the analysis of hierarchical structure. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26:2000;234-245.
17. Lamb M.R., Robertson L.C., Knight R.T. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 16:1990;471-483.
18. Lamb M.R., Yund E.W. Spatial frequency and attention: effects of level-, target, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms. Percept. Psychophysiol. 58:1996;363-373.
19. Martinez A., Moses P., Frank L., Buxton R., Wong E., Stiles J. Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI. Neuroreport. 8:1997;1685-1689.
20. McFie J., Zangwill O.L. Visual-constructive disabilities associated with lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere. Brain. 83:1960;242-259.
21. Motter B.C. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2 and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1993;909-919.
22. Rafal R., Robertson L. The neurology of visual attention. Gazzaniga M.S. The Cognitive Neurosciences. 1995;625-648 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Robertson L.C. Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125:1996;227-249.
24. Robertson L.C., Lamb M.R. Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognit. Psychol. 23:1991;299-330.
25. Robertson L.C., Lamb M.R., Knight R.T. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J. Neurosci. 8:1988;3757-3769.
26. Robertson L.C., Rafal R. Disorders of visual attention. Gazzaniga M.S. The New Cognitive Neurosciences. 2000;633-649 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Tucker D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87:1993;154-163.
28. Ward L.M. Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8:1982;562-581.