Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: Effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 442-450

  Rouzier, Roman ^b   Haddad, Bassam ^a   Dubernard, Gil ^a   Dubois, Philippe ^a   Paniel, Bernard Jean ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL DE CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CELLULITIS; FASCIA LATA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INGUINAL REGION; IRRADIATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SAPHENOUS VEIN; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VULVA CARCINOMA;

EID: 0037343976     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01895-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hacker NF, Van der Velden J. Conservative management of early vulvar cancer. Cancer 1993;71:1673-1677.
2. FIGO stage-1988 revision. Gynecol Oncol 1989;35:85-89.
3. Rhodes CA, Cummins C, Shafi MI. The management of squamous cell vulval cancer: a population based retrospective study of 411 cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:200-205.
4. Rouzier R, Morice P, Haie-Meder C, et al. Prognostic significance of epithelial disorders adjacent to invasive vulvar carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2001;81:414-419.
5. Burrell MO, Franklin EW, Campion MJ, et al. The modified radical vulvectomy with groin dissection: an eight-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:715-722.
6. Karl T, Hines G. Sartorius transposition in extra-anatomical bypass grafts. Vasc Surg 1981;15:99-105.
7. DiSaia PJ, Creasman WT, Rich WM. An alternate approach to early cancer of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133:825-832.
8. Catalona WJ. Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of the saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 1988;140: 306-310.
9. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1977;39:456-466.
10. Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Dinney CP, et al. Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol 1995;154:1999-2003.
11. Lopes A, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP, et al. Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1996;77:2099-2102.
12. Hopkins MP, Reid GC, Morley GW. The surgical management of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:1001-1005.
13. Tilmans AS, Sutton GP, Look KY, et al. Recurrent squamous carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1383-1389.
14. Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Ball H, et al. Sites of failure and times to failure in carcinoma of the vulva treated conservatively: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1128-1133.
15. Borgno G, Micheletti L, Barbero M, et al. Topographic distribution of groin lymph nodes: a study of 50 female cadavers. J Reprod Med 1990;35:1127-1129.
16. Micheletti L, Borgno G, Barbero M, et al. Deep femoral lymphadenectomy with preservation of the fascia lata. J Reprod Med 1990;35:1130-1133.
17. Levenback C, Morris M, Burke TW, et al. Groin dissection practices among gynecologic oncologists treating early vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;62:73-77.
18. Plaxe SC, Braly PS, Dottino PR. A simplified approach to superficial inguinal dissection with sparing of the saphenous vein in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:295-296.
19. Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, et al. Indices of relative weights and obesity. J Chron Dis 1972;25:329-343.
20. Vacanti CJ, Van Houten RJ, Hill RC. A statistical analysis of the relationship of physical status to postoperative mortality in 68,388 cases. Anesthesiol Analges 1970;49:564-566.
21. Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Dvoretsky PM, et al. Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:490-497.
22. Bell JG, Lea JS, Reid GC. Complete groin lymphadenectomy with preservation of the fascia lata in the treatment of vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2000;77:314-318.
23. Hacker NF, Leuchter RS, Berek JS, et al. Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through separate groin incisions. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58:574-579.
24. Helm CW, Hatch K, Austin JM, et al. A matched comparison of single and triple incision techniques for the surgical treatment of carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 46:150-156.
25. Siller BS, Alvarez RD, Conner WD, et al. T2/3 vulva cancer: a case-control study of triple incision versus en bloc radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 57:335-339.
26. Paley PJ, Johnson PR, Adcock LL, et al. The effect of sartorius transposition on wound morbidity following inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1997;64:237-241.
27. Zhang SH, Sood AK, Sorosky JI, et al. Preservation of the saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy decreases morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Cancer 2000;89: 1520-1525.
28. Levenback C, Coleman RL, Burke TW, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification with blue dye in patients with vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83: 276-281.
29. Terada KY, Coel MN, Ko P, et al. Combined use of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and lymphoscintigraphy in the management of sqamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1998;70:65-69.
30. de Hullu JA, Hollema H, Piers DA, et al. Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2811-2816.
31. Ansink AC, Sie-Go DMDS, van der Velden J, et al. Identification of sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar carcinoma patients with the aid of patent blue V injection. Cancer 1999;86:652-656.