On the standard gamble

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 157, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 225-227

  Zimmerman, Frederick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL CARE; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD;

EID: 0037343797     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.3.225     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Strunk BC, Ginsburg PB, Gabel JR. Tracking health care costs: growth accelerates again in 2001. Health Aff [web exclusive]. September 25, 2002:W299-W310. Available at: http://www.healthaffairs.org/WebExclusives/2106Strunk.pdf. Last accessed January 6, 2003.
2. Nease RF Jr, Tsai R, Hynes LM, Littenberg B. Automated utility assessment of global health. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:175-182.
3. Wells KB, Sherbourne CD. Functioning and utility for current health of patients with depression or chronic medical conditions in managed, primary care practices. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:897-904.
4. Cook KF, Ashton CM, Byrne MM, et al. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:1275-1285.
5. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1-186.
6. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences, II: scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:459-471.
7. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2000;38(suppl 9):II138-II150.
8. Green C, Brazier J, Deverill M. Valuing health-related quality of life: a review of health state valuation techniques. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:151-165.
9. Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:559-569.
10. Duru G, Auray JP, Beresniak A, Lamure M, Paine A, Nicoloyannis N. Limitations of the methods used for calculating quality-adjusted life-year values. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:463-473.
11. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Moncur M, Gabriel S, Tosteson AN. Assessing values for health: numeracy matters. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:382-390.
12. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Griffith LE, Ferrie PJ. Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2285-2294.
13. Hakim Z, Pathak DS. Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling. Health Econ. 1999;8: 103-116.