Diabetic revascularization: Improving limb salvage in the absence of autogenous vein

Seminars in Vascular Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-26

  Neville, Richard F ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; INFECTION; ISCHEMIA; LIMB SALVAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEIN GRAFT; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0037343379     PISSN: 08957967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/svas.2003.50003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Centers for Disease Control: Prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus, United States, 1980-87 MMWR 809, 1990
2. LoGerfo FW, Coffman AD: Vascular and microvascular disease of the foot in diabetes. N Engl J Med 311:1615, 1984
3. Christensen T, Neubauer B: Increased wall stiffness and thickness in medium sized arteries in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Radiol 29:299, 1988
4. Raines JK, Darling RC, Buth J, et al: Vascular laboratory criteria for the management of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities. Surgery 79:21, 1976
5. Hauser CJ, Shoemaker WC: Use of transcutaneous PO2 regional perfusion index to quantify tissue perfusion in peripheral vascular disease. Ann Surg 197:337, 1983
6. Vincent DG, Salles-Cunha SX, Bernhard VM, et al: Noninvasive assessment of toe systolic pressures with special reference to diabetes mellitus. J Cardiovasc Surg 24:22, 1983
7. Rosenblatt MS, Quist WC, Sidawy AN, et al: Lower extremity vein graft reconstruction: Results in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:331, 1990
8. Brewster DC: Composite grafts, in Rutherford RB (ed): Vascular Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1989, p 481
9. Bergan JJ, Veith FJ, Bernhard VM, et al: Randomization of autogenous vein and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femorodistal reconstruction. Surgery 92:921, 1982
10. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al: Six year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions, J Vasc Surg 3:104, 1986
11. Calligaro KD, Syrek JR, Dougherty MJ, et al: Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein compared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal bypass: Are they worth the effort? JVasc Surg 26:919, 1997
12. Holzenbien TJ, Pomposelli FB, Miller A, et al: Results of a policy either arm veins used as the first alternative to an unavailable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 23:130, 1996
13. Bell PR: Are distal vascular procedures worthwhile? Br J Surg 72:335, 1985
14. Veith FJ, Guupta SK. Ascer E, et al: Six year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 3:104, 1986
15. Whittemore AD, Craig KK, Donaldson MC, et al: What is the proper role of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal reconstruction? J Vasc Surg 10:299-305, 1989
16. Bassiouny H, White S, Glagov S, et al: Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: Mechanical injury or flow induced. Surgery 15:708-717, 1992
17. Wolfe J, Tyrell M: Venous patches, collars, and boots improve the patency rates of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Adv Vasc Surg 3:134-143, 1995
18. Siegman FA: The use of the venous cuff for graft anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148:930, 1979
19. Miller JH, Foreman RK, Fergusan L, et al: Interposition vein cuff for anastomosis of prosthesis to small artery. Aust N Z J Surg 54:283-285, 1984
20. Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, et al: Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: Long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg 79:348-354, 1992
21. Stonebridge P, Prescott R, Ruckley C: Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting with and without interposition vein cuff at the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 26:543-550, 1997
22. Kansal N, Pappas PJ, Gwertzman GA, et al: Patency and limb salvage for polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses with vein interposition cuffs. Ann Vasc Surg 13:386-392, 1999
23. Dardik H, Silvestri F, Alasio T, et al: Improved method to create the common ostium variant of the distal arteriovenous fistula for enhancing crural prosthetic graft patency. J Vasc Surg 24:240-248, 1996
24. Ascer E, Gennato M, Pollina R, et al: Complementary distal arteriovenous fistula and deep vein interposition: A five year experience with a technique to improve infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass patency. J Vasc Surg 24:134-143, 1996
25. Kreienberg PB, Darling C, Chang BB. et al: Adjunctive techniques to improve patency of distal prosthetic bypass grafts: Polytetrafluoroethylene with remote arteriovenous fistulae versus vein cuffs. J Vasc Surg 31:696-701, 2000
26. Neville RF, Attinger C, Sidawy AN: Prosthetic bypass with a distal vein patch for limb salvage. Am J Surg 174:173, 1997
27. Neville RF, Tempesta B, Sidawy AN: Tibial bypass for limb salvage using polytetrafluoroethylene with a distal vein patch. J Vasc Surg 33:266-272, 2001
28. Suggs WD, Enrique HF, DePalma RG: Vein cuff interposition prevents juxta-anastomotic hyperplasia. Ann Surg 207: 717-723, 1988
29. Norberto JJ, Sidawy AN, Trad KS, et al: The protective effect of vein cuffed anastomoses is not mechanical in origin. J Vasc Surg 21:558-566, 1995
30. How TV, Rowe CS, Gilling-Smith GL, et al: Interposition vein cuff anastomosis alters wall shear stress distribution in the recipient artery. J Vasc Surg 31:1008-1017, 2000