Suction technique to improve cement penetration under the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

Knee

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 67-73

  Stannage, Kate ^a   Shakespeare, David ^a   Bulsara, Max ^b  

^a WARWICK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cement penetration; Pulsatile lavage; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; FAT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BONE MARROW; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CANCELLOUS BONE; CANNULA; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEBRIDEMENT; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUCTION DRAINAGE; TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROBABILITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUCTION; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037342118     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00084-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Windsor R.E., Scuderi G.R., Moran M.C., et al. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 248:1989;15-19.
2. Cameron H.U., Hunter G.A. Failure in total knee arthroplasty; mechanisms, revisions and results. Clin Orthop. 170:1982;141-146.
3. Lonner J.H., Klotz M., Levitz C., et al. Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design. J Arthroplasty. 16:2001;107-111.
4. Maistrelli G.L., Antonelli L., Fornasier V., et al. Cement penetration with pulsed lavage versus syringe irrigation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 312:1995;261-265.
5. Ritter M.A., Herbst S.A., Keating E.M., et al. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg. 76A:1994;60-65.
6. Krause W.R., Krug W., Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop. 163:1982;290-299.
7. Rey R.M., Paiment G.D., McGann W.M., et al. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex-P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model. Clin Orthop. 215:1987;272-278.
8. Ducheyne P., Kagan A. II, Lacey J.A. Failure of total knee arthroplasty due to loosening and deformation of the tibial component. J Bone Jt Surg. 60A:1978;384-391.
9. Walker P.S., Soudry M., Ewald F.C., et al. Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 185:1984;155-164.
10. Bannister G.C., Miles A.W. The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface. Eng Med. 17:1988;131-133.
11. Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Total knee arthroplasty - current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop. 276:1992;26-32.
12. Dorr L.D., Lindberg J.P., Claude-Faugere M., et al. Factors influencing the intrusion of methylmethacrylate into human tibiae. Clin Orthop. 183:1984;147-152.
13. Majkowski R.S., Miles A.W., Bannister G.C., et al. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg (Br). 75B:1993;459-463.
14. Gruen T.A., Markolf K.L., Amstutz H.C. Effects of laminations and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone cement. Clin Orthop. 119:1976;250-255.
15. Mann K.A., Ayers D.C., Werner F.W., et al. Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement. J Biomech. 30:1997;339-346.
16. MacDonald W., Swarts E., Beaver R. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo. Clin Orthop. 286:1993;283-288.
17. Majkowski R.S., Bannister G.C., Miles W. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop. 299:1994;293-297.
18. Huiskes R., Slooff T.J. Thermal injury of cancellous bone following pressurised penetration of acrylic cement. Trans Orthop Res Soc Feb. 1981;134.
19. Phillips A.M., Tomlinson J.E., Goddard N.J. Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 78:1996;515-520.
20. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic and scoring system. Clin Orthop. 248:1989;9-12.
21. Cnaan A., Laird N.M., Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med. 16:1997;2349-2380.
22. Keselman H.J., Algina J., Kowalchuk R.K. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 54:2001;1-20.
23. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through Release 6.12, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc. (1997) 1167.
24. Font-Rodriguez D.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 345:1997;70-86.
25. Rand J.A., Ilstrup D.M. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg. 73A:1991;397-409.
26. Nelissen R.G., Brand R., Rozing P.M. Survivorship analysis in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg. 74A:1992;383-389.
27. Lee R.W., Volz R.G., Sheridan D.C. The role of fixation and bone quality on the mechanical stability of tibial knee components. Clin Orthop. 273:1991;177-183.
28. Smith S., Naima V.S., Freeman M.A. The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 14:1999;3-8.
29. Kim Y.H., Walker P.S., Deland J.T. A cement impactor for uniform cement penetration in the upper tibia. Clin Orthop. 182:1984;206-210.
30. Bert J.M., McShane M. Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 356:1998;73-78.
31. Norton M.R., Eyres K.S. Irrigation and suction technique to ensure reliable cement penetration for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 15:2000;468-474.
32. Banwart J.C., McQueen D.A., Friis E.A., et al. Negative pressure intrusion cementing technique for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 15:2000;360-367.